“三角协调模式”视角下的交叉学科治理:理路与进路  

Interdiscipline Governance from Perspective of the"Triangular Coordination Model":Theoretical Rationale and Practice Pathways

作　　者：张艳凤 王铭玉 ZHANG Yan-feng;WANG Ming-yu(South China Business College of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies,Guangzhou 510545,China;Tianjin Foreign Studies University,Tianjin 300204,China)

机构地区：[1]广东外语外贸大学南国商学院,广东广州510545 [2]天津外国语大学,天津300204

出　　处：《黑龙江高教研究》2025年第4期115-121,共7页Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education

基　　金：广东省高等教育科学研究专题“从学科规训迈向学科治理:新文科视域下学科交叉融合机制与路径研究”(编号:2024GXJK556)的成果。

摘　　要：我国交叉学科治理经历了孕育萌生、试点探索、初具雏形、正式确立等四个阶段,政府力量、学术力量、市场力量构成了我国交叉学科治理的动力机制,展现了交叉学科治理的制度逻辑、知识逻辑和实践逻辑。在现实层面,受到政策协调激励不足、学科知识整合受限、市场响应机制不畅等因素的制约,交叉学科治理存在协同乏力、壁垒突出、供需失衡等问题。面向未来,我国交叉学科治理应着力塑造交叉学科治理新生态、构建交叉学科知识新领域、探索交叉学科培养新模式、建立交叉学科评价新体系,进一步彰显我国交叉学科发展的创新引领效应,构建现代化学科治理体系。The interdisciplinary governance in China has gone through four stages:conception,pilot exploration,prototype and formal establishment.The government power,academic power and market power constitute the dynamic mechanism of the interdisciplinary governance in China,showing the institutional logic,knowledge logic and practical logic of the interdisciplinary governance.At the realistic level,constrained by factors such as insufficient incentives for policy coordination,limited integration of disciplinary knowledge and poor market response mechanism,interdisciplinary governance is characterized by lack of synergy,prominent barriers and imbalance between supply and demand.Facing the future,China's interdisciplinary governance should focus on shaping the new ecology of interdisciplinary governance,constructing a new field of interdisciplinary knowledge,exploring a new mode of interdisciplinary training,and establishing a new system of interdisciplinary evaluation,so as to further highlight the innovation-leading effect of interdisciplinary development in China,and build a modernized disciplinary governance system.

关 键 词：“三角协调模式” 交叉学科 治理 

分 类 号：G640[文化科学—高等教育学]