检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田玉潇 李梁 TIAN Yuxiao;LI Liang(Minzu University of China,Beijing 100074)
机构地区:[1]中央民族大学,北京100074
出 处:《浙江万里学院学报》2025年第2期24-31,共8页Journal of Zhejiang Wanli University
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目“环境犯罪治理的数字化应对策略研究”(23BFX118)。
摘 要:污染环境罪是环境犯罪的基本罪名。伴随着国家对生态环境保护力度的加强,《中华人民共和国刑法修正案(十一)》适时对污染环境罪的刑罚配置进行了完善,新增一档法定刑,降低了入罪门槛,体现出从严处罚污染环境行为的立法趋势,为环境司法提供了更为明确的法律依据。然而,现有的刑罚配置在应对不断提高的生态文明需求时仍有不足。通过分析当前司法实务中存在处罚力度轻缓、罚金刑配置标准不明、资格刑缺位、缺乏恢复性制裁措施等问题,文章倡议采取加大处罚力度、明晰罚金刑配置、完善资格刑、规定恢复性制裁方法等可行措施,为我国的生态文明建设提供更为坚实的法律保障。The crime of environmental pollution is a fundamental offense within the category of environmental crimes.As the nation strengthens its efforts in ecological and environmental protection,the Amendment(XI)to the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China has timely refined the penalty structure for this offense,introducing a new tier of statutory penalties and lowering the threshold for criminal liability.This reflects a legislative trend toward stricter punishment for environmental pollution,providing a clearer legal foundation for environmental justice.However,the existing penalty framework remains insufficient in addressing the increasingly stringent demands of ecological civilization.An in-depth analysis of current judicial practice issues such as lenient penalties,unclear standards for imposing fines,the absence of qualifying penalties,and the lack of restorative sanctions.This paper advocates for feasible measures,such as increasing penalty severity,clarifying the imposition of fines,enhancing qualification penalties,and establishing restorative sanction mechanisms.The aim is to provide a more solid legal guarantee for China’s ecological civilization construction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7