检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:温柔悦 WEN Rouyue(Hainan University,Haikou 570100,China)
机构地区:[1]海南大学,海口570100
出 处:《高科技与产业化》2025年第2期126-128,共3页High-Technology & Commercialization
摘 要:损害赔偿数额问题历来为知识产权研究的重难点,其中基本损害赔偿方式是确定赔偿基数或法定赔偿与惩罚性赔偿数额的参考基准。司法实践中对赔偿方式的合理运用和对赔偿数额的确定存在争议,法定赔偿适用泛化、损害赔偿数额与被侵害人实际损失不相符的问题广泛存在。侵权获利损害赔偿方式作为三种基本赔偿方式之一,存在的问题在于确定侵权获利考量因素不明确、可扣除成本与利润分割理论滞后、证明程序和证明责任不利于权利人等。通过确定基数考量因素,明确扣除成本选择和具细化利润分割规则来完善侵权获利损害赔偿方式。The determination of compensation in IP disputes is complex,focusing on setting a baseline for damages or statutory and punitive awards.Disputes arise in judicial practice over the application of these methods and the quantification of damages,with issues like overuse of statutory damages and a mismatch between awarded amounts and actual losses.The profit-based compensation method,one of three main approaches,suffers from vague factors for calculating infringer’s profits,outdated cost-deduction and profit-sharing theories,and an unfavorable proof process for rights holders.This method can be refined by defining base factors,clarifying cost deductions,and detailing profit-sharing rules.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49