华资银行的兴起与清季民国金融行业的职业流动  

Rise of Chinese Funded Banks and the Occupational Mobility in the Financial Industry during the Late Qing and Republic of China Periods

作　　者：贾欣潮 周亚[1] Jia Xinchao;Zhou Ya

机构地区：[1]山西大学历史文化学院,太原030006

出　　处：《中国经济史研究》2025年第2期109-123,共15页Researches in Chinese Economic History

基　　金：国家社科基金冷门“绝学”研究专项“票号民间文献整理、释读与研究”(批准号:19VJX028)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：金融行业的职业流动与近代中国特定的社会条件相关联,即“制度移植”外表下的银行发展缺乏与其相对应的专用性人力资本。因此,华资银行只得从性质相近的票号和钱庄中寻找人力资源。在这一基础上,银行在薪酬激励、人事制度和行业前景等方面展现的优势造成传统金融机构人力资本流失。20世纪二三十年代,为塑造稳定而可靠的职业队伍,华资银行凭借新式教育力求革新人事,而钱庄的人事改良却因治理结构的局限收效甚微。金融行业的职业流动表明,近代新型职业群体的成型既需借助传统行业的力量,也需企业在经营实践中进行调整和重塑。The occupational mobility in the financial industry is related to the specific social conditions in modern China,namely the lack of specialized human capital corresponding to the development of banks under the guise of institutional transplantation.Therefore,Chinese banks have to search for human resources from piaohao and native banks.On this basis,the advantages demonstrated by banks in salary incentives,personnel systems,and industry prospects have led to the loss of human capital in traditional financial institutions.In the 1920s and 1930s,in order to shape a stable and reliable professional team,Chinese banks sought to innovate personnel through modern education,while the personnel improvement of the native bank had little effect due to the limitations of its governance structure.The occupational mobility in the financial industry indicates that the formation of modern new occupational groups requires both the power of traditional industries and the adjustment and reshaping of enterprises in business practices.

关 键 词：金融变革 职业流动 华资银行 传统金融机构 

分 类 号：F83[经济管理—金融学]