检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李俊强[1] 徐辉 Li Junqiang;Xu Hui(Faculty of Low,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan Hunan 411105,China)
出 处:《河北科技师范学院学报(社会科学版)》2025年第1期10-16,25,共8页Journal of Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“晋令辑佚、考释与研究”(17BFX028)。
摘 要:检察机关提前介入监察调查机制成为提高监察调查工作规范化和法治化水平的重要手段。但理论层面对检察机关提前介入监察调查机制是否具有监督性仍然存在不同的认识,使得检察机关提前介入监察调查中的角色定位陷入较为尴尬的境地。对此,立足于检察机关“国家法律监督机关”的宪法定位,肯定检察机关提前介入监察调查机制具有监督性。未来机制优化中,应厘清检察机关提前介入监察调查机制中法律监督机关的职能定位为前提,不断制定完善检察机关提前介入监察调查机制的操作细节,明确各自权力边界,以提高职务犯罪案件办理质效,促进监检衔接。The early intervention of procuratorial organs in supervision and investigation has become an important means of improving the standardization of supervisory investigations and the level of the rule of law.Whether the early intervention is supervisory makes the role of the procuratorial organs awkward in the supervision and investigation mechanism.The Constitution endowed the procuratorial organs rights of supervision as the national legal supervisory authority,and the operational details of the mechanism of early intervention of the procuratorial organs in the supervision and investigation should be formulated and improved,and the boundaries of their respective powers should be clarified,so as to improve the quality of handling of cases of job-related crimes and to promote the convergence of supervision and investigation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62