行政法治的数智化法理  

The Digitization of Jurisprudence of Administrative Rule of Law

作　　者：齐延平 QI Yanping(Law School,Beijing Institute of Technology)

机构地区：[1]不详

出　　处：《法学家》2025年第2期40-53,192,共15页The Jurist

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“互联网平台的社会影响及其治理路径研究”(21&ZD195)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：行政法治的数智化再造,将实现对传统行政权力和行政相对人权利的一体技术宰制,但其依然应当坚守人本法理,没有亦不允许突破基于人本的行政法律关系主体理论,以及基于自由意志的行政法律责任认定与归结原则。由面对面行政到界面行政所体现的执法去人格化逻辑,契合主观性执法不断客观化的法治演进规律。通过执法规范代码指令化、中介要素技术化、执法场景去人化,行政法治实现数智化孪生,其正当性的维系,有赖于自动化系统的安全可信、行政裁量梯度量表的科学化以及对行政法规范算法化运行之社会共识的达成,而程序合法和实体正义是达致上述目标的法理基石。The digitized reconstruction of administrative rule of law will realize a unified technological dominance over traditional administrative powers and the rights of administrative counterparts,but it remains adhering to humanistic jurisprudence.It prohibits breaching neither the humanism-based theory of administrative legal relationship subjects,nor the principles of determining and attributing administrative legal responsibility based on free will.The depersonalization logic inherent in the transition from face-to-face administration to interface administration aligns with the evolutionary trend of the rule of law towards objectifying subjective law enforcement.Through the codification of enforcement norms,the technologization of intermediary elements,and the depersonalization of enforcement scenarios,administrative rule of law achieve a digital twin.Its legitimacy and justification rely on the security and reliability of automated systems,the scientific quantification of administrative discretion,and the social consensus on the algorithmic operation of administrative regulations.Procedural legality and substantive justice are the legal cornerstones for realizing these objectives.

关 键 词：行政法治 人本法理 界面化逻辑 数智化孪生 自动化行政 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]