《民法典》第1195条(“通知删除”规则)评注  

Comments on Article 1195 of the Civil Code(the“Notice-Deletion”Rule)

作　　者：王滢 WANG Ying(Law School of Nanjing University of Finance and Economics)

机构地区：[1]南京财经大学法学院

出　　处：《法学家》2025年第2期175-190,196,共17页The Jurist

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“我国民法评注编纂重大问题研究”(22&ZD205)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：《民法典》第1195条是网络侵权领域的“通知-删除”规则。本条属于请求权基础规范,前两款与第3款均是独立的请求权基础。本条是第1197条的特殊情形。经过有效通知,方能产生采取必要措施的行为义务。必要措施不限于删除、屏蔽、断开链接。构成侵权的初步证据和服务类型,对行为义务的认定产生实质性影响。采取措施的及时性,可根据网络服务的类型和性质、通知的准确程度、侵权构成的确定性程度、侵害权益的类型和程度等因素综合判断。错误通知责任是过错责任,过错形态包括故意与过失。因果关系贡献度和过错程度影响损害赔偿的范围。Article 1195 of the Civil Code stipulates the“notice deletion”rule in the field of online infringement.It belongs to the Norms of Anspruchsgrundlage.The first two clauses and the third clause constitute independent Anspruchsgrundlage respectively.In terms of its relationship with Article 1197,this provision constitutes a special circumstance under Article 1197.Only through effective notification can the obligation to take necessary measures be derived.The necessary measures are not limited to deleting,blocking,and disconnecting links.The preliminary evidence of infringement and network service types have a substantial impact on the determination of such behavioral obligations.The timeliness of taking measures can be comprehensively judged based on factors such as the type and nature of network services,the accuracy of notifications,the degree of certainty of infringement,and the type and degree of infringement of rights and interests.The principle of attribution of liability for erroneous notification is also the principle of fault liability,and the forms of fault of the perpetrator of erroneous notification include intention and negligence.The contribution and degree of fault in causal relationships have a significant impact on determining the scope of compensation for damages.

关 键 词：网络服务提供者 帮助侵权 有效通知 必要措施 连带责任 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]