何处是“畿南”:明代“畿南”观念的整合与建构  

Where was“Jinan”:Integration and Construction of the“Jinan”Concept in the Ming Dynasty

作　　者：高晓晗 Gao Xiaohan(School of History and Culture,Minzu University of China,Beijing,China,100081)

机构地区：[1]中央民族大学历史文化学院,北京100081

出　　处：《地方文化研究》2024年第6期22-33,共12页Local Culture Research

摘　　要：“畿南”是形成于明代的重要地域概念,具体范围为隶属北直隶处于京师以南的真定、河间、保定、顺德、广平、大名六府。“畿南”观念在明代经历了从明前中期“六府”整体性的显现与巩固,到嘉靖时期“畿南”观念形成及至明后期最终成熟的历时性过程。及至晚明时期,随着时局变迁和对畿南地区内地性与政治属性的挖掘,“畿南”观念又产生了传递畿南困境的幽隐和对京畿进行危机叙事两大嬗变。明代“畿南”观念是在国家治理实践过程中逐渐凸显的自主意识,其整合与建构是当时社会存在与社会意识互动关系的生动写照。“Jinan”is an important regional concept formed in the Ming Dynasty,specifically referring to the six prefectures of Zhending,Hejian,Baoding,Shunde,Guangping,and Daming,which were located to the south of the capital and belonged to Northern Zhili.In the Ming Dynasty,the concept of“Jinan”experienced a diachronic process from the overall appearance and consolidation of“six prefectures”in the early and middle of the Ming Dynasty,to the formation of the“Jinan”concept in Emperor Jiajing’s reign,and to the final maturity in the late Ming Dynasty.With the changes of the current situation and the exploration of the nature of“Jinan”as a region within the capital area and its political attribute in the late Ming Dynasty,the concept of“Jinan”experienced two major changes:conveying the predicament of the“Jinan”region and the narration of the crisis of the“Jinan”region.The concept of“Jinan”in the Ming Dynasty is a self-consciousness gradually highlighted in the process of national governance,and its integration and construction is a vivid portrayal of the interaction between social existence and social consciousness at that time.

关 键 词：明代 畿南 北直隶 国家治理 区域概念史 

分 类 号：K248[历史地理—历史学]