评价理论视角下中美主流媒体第三届“一带一路”报道话语分析  

Discourse Analysis of“The Third BRF”Reported by China and US Media from the Perspective of Appraisal Theory

作　　者：徐璐璐 林琼[1] 金嫣 XU Lulu;LIN Qiong;JIN Yan(School of Foreign Languages,Ningbo University of Technology,Ningbo 315211,China)

机构地区：[1]宁波工程学院外国语学院,浙江宁波315211

出　　处：《宁波工程学院学报》2025年第1期37-43,共7页Journal of Ningbo University of Technology

基　　金：宁波工程学院大学生创新训练项目(2024040)。

摘　　要：为探索中美主流媒体在报道“第三届‘一带一路’国际合作高峰论坛”时的评价差异与介入资源分布特征,基于评价理论介入系统框架,运用UAM Corpus Tool语料库工具,就China Daily和CNN网站上所收集整理的新闻报道作介入资源分析,进而得出中美主流媒体在报道中的关注侧重点、评价差异,以及介入资源的特征。研究结果发现:双方都有大量使用“自言”资源,而在扩展和收缩对话空间上,双方呈现出不同的倾向。同时,CNN和China Daily的报道在“自言”中,所表达的观点截然不同。To find out the evaluation differences and the distribution traits of engagement resources between the mainstream media in China and the United States in their coverage on“The Third Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation”(The Third BRF),the present paper,taking as the theoretical basis the engagement system of the appraisal theory and based on the UAM Corpus Tool,endeavors to make a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the data collected form the China Daily and CNN websites in the light of the focus,evaluation differences and engagement resources traits in their coverage and concludes that both utilize a lot of“Monogloss”,and show different tendencies in Expand and Contract,besides,the coverage of CNN and China Daily expresses different opinions in“Monogloss”.

关 键 词：评价理论 介入系统 第三届“一带一路”国际合作高峰论坛 UAM Corpus Tool 

分 类 号：H030[语言文字—语言学]