检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蒋学威 Jiang Xuewei
出 处:《河北科技图苑》2025年第1期68-75,共8页Hebei Library Journal of Science and Technology
基 金:国家社科基金重点项目“明代宫廷图书史”(20ATQ003)的研究成果。
摘 要:《四库全书总目提要》是传统目录学的集大成之作,代表着中国古代目录学“辨章学术,考镜源流”的最高成就。明代敕撰修图书是明代文化史和出版史的重要组成部分,也是明代典章制度、法律礼制、意识形态的物质载体。四库馆臣在《四库全书总目提要》中对明代敕撰修图书评价不高,甚至以批评为主,对后世学者认识明代敕撰修图书产生了深刻影响。文章通过系统爬梳四库馆臣对明代敕撰修图书评价的类型,对《提要》中关于明代敕撰修图书的态度进行了梳理与辨析,分析了造成四库馆臣对明代敕撰修图书所持偏见的相关因素。Catalog of the Complete Library in the Four Branches of Literature is a masterpiece of traditional bibliography,representing the highest achievement of ancient Chinese bibliography of“distinguishing academic chapters and examining the source of mirrors”.The imperial compilation and revision of books in the Ming Dynasty is an important part of the cultural history and publishing history of the Ming Dynasty,and it is also the material carrier of the Ming Dynasty s code system,legal etiquette system,and ideology.In Catalog of the Complete Library in the Four Branches of Literature,the four branches officials did not have a high evaluation of the Ming Dynasty s imperial compilation and revision,and even criticized them,which had a profound impact on later scholars understanding of the Ming Dynasty edict and revision books.This paper systematically sorts out the types of evaluation of the Ming Dynasty books by the four branches officials,sorts out and analyzes the attitudes of the Ming Dynasty edicts in Catalog of the Complete Library in the Four Branches of Literature,and analyzes the relevant factors that cause the prejudice of the Siku librarians against the Ming Dynasty edicts.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7