检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:力丽芬 李玮[1] 李国敏 LI Lifen;LI Wei;LI Guomin(College of Economics and Management,Taiyuan University of Technology,Jinzhong 030600,China)
机构地区:[1]太原理工大学经济与管理学院,山西晋中030600
出 处:《煤炭经济研究》2025年第2期97-103,共7页Coal Economic Research
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(72104172)。
摘 要:省际贸易使得不同地区在贸易中承担的碳排放与获得的增加值之间存在不平等问题。因此,为确保减排责任的公平分配,本研究在追踪碳排放和增加值转移的基础上,基于新构建的碳不平等指数进一步分析了2017年30个省份间的贸易碳不平等问题。研究发现:2017年,全国碳排放净转移量达到了3.9亿t;碳排放和增加值呈现出不平等的转移态势。碳排放主要由发达省份向发展中省份转移,而增加值则主要由发展中省份向发达省份转移;在贸易过程中,广东和北京导致多数省份面临碳不平等问题,山西和内蒙古则是碳不平等的主要受害者;此外,发达省份与发展中省份之间的碳不平等程度显著。最后,基于上述研究成果,针对我国碳减排政策提出了切实可行的建议。Inter provincial trade creates inequality between the carbon emission and value-added obtained by different regions in trade.Therefore,to ensure fair distribution of emission reduction responsibility,this study further analyzed the trade carbon inequality among 30 provinces in 2017 based on the newly constructed carbon inequality index,while tracking carbon emission and value-added transfer.Research has found that in 2017,the net transfer of carbon emission in China reached 390 million tons;Carbon emission and value-added showed an unequal transfer trend.Carbon emission mainly transferred from developed provinces to developing provinces,while valueadded mainly transferred from developing provinces to developed provinces;In the process of trade,Beijing and Guangdong had led to carbon inequality in most provinces,while Shanxi and Inner Mongolia were the main victims of carbon inequality;In addition,there was a significant degree of carbon inequality between developed and developing provinces.Finally,based on the above research results,this study proposed practical and feasible suggestions for China′s carbon reduction policies.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170