检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:崔健健 CUI Jian-jian(School of history,University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 102488,China)
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院大学历史学院,北京102488
出 处:《青海师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第6期93-100,共8页Journal of Qinghai Normal University(Social Sciences)
摘 要:封建帝制时期,官场“发人私书”现象始终与专制皇权存在紧密的联动关系:其行为产生,以皇帝的禁忌为不可或缺的政治前提;其松驰严禁,取决于皇帝巩固皇权的现实需要;“私书”能否成为官员获罪判刑的法律依据,也由皇帝充当最后的仲裁者。同时,这种联动关系也决定了官场“发人私书”现象可以作为考察专制皇权的一面“镜子”,补充对其神圣性、伸张性、独裁性的细节性认知。During the feudal-imperial period,the phenomenon of“denouncing others'private letters”always had a close linkage with the autocratic imperial power.Its behavior,to the emperor's taboo as an essential political prerequisite;its relaxation and strict prohibition,depends on the emperor to consolidate the real needs of imperial power;and,“private letters”can become the legal basis for officials to be convicted and sentenced,the emperor still acts as the final arbiter.At the same time,this linkage also determines that the phenomenon of“denouncing others'private letters”can be used as a“mirror”to examine the authoritarian imperial power,complementing the knowledge of the sanctity,extension and dictatorship of imperial power.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49