民族主义·世界主义·跨民族研究:美国本土裔文学批评理论的张力与流变  

Nationalism,cosmopolitanism,and transnational studies:Tensions and fluxes in the critical theory of Native American literature

作　　者：陈靓[1] CHEN Liang(College of Foreign Languages and Literatures,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433,China)

机构地区：[1]复旦大学,上海市200433

出　　处：《外文研究》2025年第2期97-104,109,110,F0003,共11页Foreign Studies

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“美国本土裔文学学术史”(18BWW093)。

摘　　要：当代美国本土裔文学深受美国本土裔口述传统影响,其文本承载和传递了独特的族裔特质和认识理念。同时,在全球化流散的语境下也呈现出多元的包容特质。就美国本土裔文学批评话语和理论建构而言,需基于本土裔文化中的部落意识、地域特点、语言特色和身份观等因素,采用契合本土裔视角和文化模式的批评角度来分析作品中的族裔性,关注其在全球语境下的批评空间拓展。本文将主要从美国本土裔文学批评的两大流派(民族主义与世界主义)的纷争谈起,延伸到跨民族研究,进而在对当前的美国本土裔文学批评的流变梳理中对其特质和发展趋势进行分析。Contemporary Native American literature is deeply influenced by the oral tradition of Native Americans,and its texts carry and convey unique ethnic qualities and concepts of understanding,and at the same time,in the context of globalization and diaspora,they also present diverse and inclusive qualities.In terms of the critical discourse and theory construction of Native American literature,it is necessary to analyze the ethnicity of the works based on the tribal consciousness,regional characteristics,linguistic features and identity of Native American culture,and adopt the critical perspective that fits the native American perspective and cultural model,while paying attention to the expansion of the critical space in the context of globalization.This paper will mainly start from the dispute between the two major schools of native American literary criticism:nationalism and cosmopolitanism,and extend to trans-ethnic studies,and then analyze its qualities and development trends in the current flow of native American literary criticism.

关 键 词：美国本土裔文学批评 民族性 世界性 跨民族批评 

分 类 号：I106[文学—世界文学]