不同烤烟品种烟叶产质量综合评价  

Comprehensive Evaluation of Yield and Quality of Different Flue-cured Tobacco Varieties

作　　者：蔡何青 吴学巧 喻奇伟 黄兰 刘涛 刘育栋 马建光 CAI Heqing;WU Xueqiao;YU Qiwei;HUANG Lan;LIU Tao;LIU Yudong;MA Jianguang(Bijie City Tobacco Company of Guizhou Province,Bijie 551700,China)

机构地区：[1]贵州省烟草公司毕节市公司,贵州毕节551700

出　　处：《特产研究》2025年第2期6-10,共5页Special Wild Economic Animal and Plant Research

基　　金：中国烟总公司贵州省公司科技项目(201904、2020XM07);贵州省烟草公司毕节市公司科技项目(202105)。

摘　　要：为评价不同烤烟品种在威宁烟区的适应性,本文以云烟87为对照,对贵烟202、湘烟5号、云烟105和云烟116等品种的生育期、植物学性状、农艺性状、经济性状、化学成分和感官质量进行比较,运用灰色关联度分析法进行综合性状评价。结果表明,4个品种的生育期均长于对照,贵烟202和云烟105的田间生长势最强;贵烟202的株高最高,其次是云烟116;云烟105叶片数最多,其次是湘烟5号;4个品种的产量、产值均高于对照,贵烟202的产量、产值最高,其次是云烟105;云烟105和云烟116钾含量较高;贵烟202和云烟105烟叶感官质量表现最好;灰色关联度分析结果表明,贵烟202的等权关联度值最高,综合表现最优,应根据生产实际情况示范验证后可推广。In order to evaluate the adaptability of different flue-cured tobacco varieties in Weining tobacco area,taking Yunyan 87 as the control,the growth period,botanical characters,agronomic characters,economic characters,chemical components and sensory quality of Guiyan 202,Xiangyan 5,Yunyan 105 and Yunyan 116 were compared,and the comprehensive characters were evaluated by grey correlation analysis.The results showed that the growth period of the four varieties was longer than that of the control,the field growth potential of Guiyan 202 and Yunyan 105 was the strongest,the plant height of Guiyan 202 was the highest,followed by Yunyan 116,the leaf number of Yunyan 105 was the most,followed by Xiangyan 5,the yield and output value of the four varieties were higher than those of the control,the yield and output value of Guiyan 202 was the highest,followed by Yunyan 105,the potassium content of Yunyan 105 and Yunyan 116 was higher,and the sensory quality of Guiyan 202 and Yunyan 105 was the best.The results of grey correlation analysis show that Guiyan 202 has the highest equal weight correlation value and the best comprehensive performance.It can be recommended to promote after demonstra-tion according to the actual situation of producition.

关 键 词：烤烟 品种 产量 质量 综合评价 

分 类 号：S572[农业科学—烟草工业]