组态视角下退牧还草工程牧民满意度及其影响机制——以黄河源区玛多县为例  

Research on herdsmen′s satisfaction and its influence mechanism of Pastureland Rehabilitation Program from configuration perspective:a case study of Maduo County in the Yellow River source area

作　　者：夏翠珍 周立华 裴孝东 李军豪 王娅 XIA Cuizhen;ZHOU Lihua;PEI Xiaodong;LI Junhao;WANG Ya(School of Politics and Public Administration,Guangxi Normal University,Guilin 541006,China;Institutes of Science and Development,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China;Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Lanzhou 730000,China)

机构地区：[1]广西师范大学政治与公共管理学院,桂林541006 [2]中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院,北京100190 [3]中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院,兰州730000

出　　处：《生态学报》2025年第6期2630-2642,共13页Acta Ecologica Sinica

基　　金：第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究(2019QZKK0404);中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(A类)(XDA20020401);中国科学院青海省人民政府三江源国家公园联合研究专项(LHZX-2020-09)。

摘　　要：退牧还草工程是中国牧区最重要的草地保护工程,了解工程的牧民满意度及其影响机制对优化工程管理,持续推进草地恢复具有重要意义。基于对黄河源区玛多县266户牧民的调查,运用模糊集定性比较分析和最优尺度回归方法,从组态视角探究了4种公共价值与5种生计资本对牧民满意度的影响。结果表明:(1)单一价值或资本不是构成牧民高或低满意度的必要条件,存在多种导致牧民高满意度和低满意度的组态路径;(2)高满意度的牧民可分为积极价值感知-高资本型、积极价值感知-低资本型。在高价值感知及高心理资本情况下,金融、物质和社会资本的高水平或低水平组合均可导致牧民的高满意度;(3)低满意度的牧民可分为消极价值感知-低资本型、消极价值感知-部分高资本型。在低价值感知及低心理资本情况下,部分资本的高水平不会改变牧民的低满意度;(4)相比生计资本,价值感知对牧民满意度的影响更大。合理、效率、公平和效益四种价值及心理资本协同发挥重要正向影响,其它生计资本的作用方向受组态关系约束;(5)加大公平价值供给是避免牧民低满意度的关键,提升工程全周期管理水平,巩固牧民心理资本和金融资本是提升牧民满意度的有效策略。As the paramount grassland conservation initiative in China′s grazing regions,comprehending the satisfaction levels and impact mechanisms of herders regarding the Pastureland Rehabilitation Program is crucial for refining project administration and advancing grassland regeneration.This paper used the methods of fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis and optimal scale regression to explore the impact of four types of value perceptions and five types of livelihood capital on herdsmen′s satisfaction from a configuration perspective based on the survey of 266 herdsmen in Maduo County,the source area of the Yellow River.The results showed that:(1)Neither single value nor capital was a necessary precondition for herdsmen′s high or low satisfaction,and there were multiple configuration paths that led to high and low satisfaction among herdsmen;(2)Herdsmen with high satisfaction could be categorized into two types:those possessing positive value perception and high livelihood capital,and those with positive value perception and low livelihood capital.In scenarios characterized by high value perception and high psychological capital,the presence of financial,material,and social capital,irrespective of being high or low,could result in high levels of satisfaction among herders;(3)Herdsmen with low satisfaction can be categorized into two types:those with negative value perception and low livelihood capital,and those with negative value perception and partially high capital.In scenarios characterized by low value perception and low psychological capital,the high level of some types of livelihood capital would not change herdsmen′s low satisfaction;(4)Compared with livelihood capital,value perception had a stronger impact on herdsmen′s satisfaction.The four values of rationality,efficiency,fairness and efficiency,along with psychological capital,synergistically exerted significant positive influences on herdsmen′s satisfaction,and the influence direction of other types of livelihood capital were constrained b

关 键 词：退牧还草 满意度 fsQCA 生计资本 玛多 

分 类 号：R47[医药卫生—护理学]