刑法目的解释中的“目的”探寻  

Exploring the“Purpose”in the Interpretation of Purpose of Criminal Law

作　　者：袁汉兴 Yuan Hanxing(Chengdu University,Chengdu,Sichuan 610106)

机构地区：[1]成都大学,四川成都610106

出　　处：《河南司法警官职业学院学报》2025年第1期62-67,共6页Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College

基　　金：2017年度国家社会科学基金一般项目“刑法解释基本原理之系统归正研究”(17BFX075);成都大学2022年校级实验教学研究与改革项目一般项目“证据法学实验教学的体系建设”(cdsyjg2022009)的研究成果。

摘　　要：对于刑法目的解释中的“目的”,存在着立法原意说、客观需要说、刑事政策说及处罚妥当性说四种主要立场。前三种学说均存在某种程度的缺陷。处罚妥当性说提出,目的论解释既有缩小成文的日常用语的意义进行解释的场合,也有必须扩张其意义进行解释的场合,至于何种场合进行限缩解释或扩张解释,由处罚的妥当性决定。相比而言,处罚妥当性说是更为有力的学说,不但能够化解不同解释方法带来的意见分歧,而且有利于兼顾刑法的打击犯罪机能和人权保障机能。There are four main positions regarding the“purpose”in the interpretation of criminal law purposes:the theory of legislative intention,the theory of objective needs,the theory of criminal policy,and the theory of appropriateness of punishment.The first three theories all have some degree of deficiency.The theory of appropriateness of punishment proposes that the purpose oriented interpretation can be applied in situations where the meaning of everyday language is reduced,as well as in situations where its meaning must be expanded.As for which occasions to limit or expand the interpretation,it is determined by the appropriateness of punishment.Compared to other theories,the theory of appropriateness of punishment is a more powerful one,which can not only resolve differences in opinions caused by different interpretation methods,but also help balance the anti crime function and human rights protection function of criminal law.

关 键 词：目的解释 立法原意 客观需要 刑事政策 处罚妥当性 

分 类 号：DF6[政治法律—刑法学]