从两部王韵比较论敦煌本在学术史中的地位  

Discussion on the Academic Status of Duanghuang Script of Wang Yun Compared with the Songba Script

作　　者：丁治民 李惠超 王术源 Ding Zhimin;Li Huichao;Wang Shuyuan

机构地区：[1]上海大学文学院 [2]温州大学人文学院 [3]上海市工商外国语学校

出　　处：《中国语言学研究》2024年第2期20-36,316,共18页Journal of Studies on Languages in China

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“东亚汉字文化圈《切韵》文献集成与研究”(19ZDA316);冷门“绝学”和国别史研究专项“敦煌本王韵与唐宋诸本韵书比较研究”(19VJX126)阶段性成果

摘　　要：从去声“严”韵的来源、宋跋本反切所存在的问题与类隔切三个方面论述,《广韵》编纂所采录的“王仁昫增加字”应只能是敦煌本王韵,而非宋跋本王韵。宋跋本的价值只是全本,保存大部分小韵、反切及韵字的面貌,但缺误较多。学术界应重视并重新认识敦煌本王韵在学术史中的地位与价值,王韵研究当以敦煌本为主、宋跋本为辅,而不是相反。It is discussed from the following three aspects namely the source of the falling tone of rhyme“Yan(严)”,problems existing in Fanqie of Songbascript,and Leigeqie(When the Fanqie upper character voiced different in tongue and lip from its under character)(类隔切)that the“Wang Renxu added words”collected in the compilation of Guang Yun should only be the Dunhuang script of Wang Yun,not the Songba script of Wang Yun.The value of Songba script is only about the whole book,preserving the appearance of most of the small rhymes,Fanqie and rhyme characters.The academic community should revalue the status of Dunhuang script of Wang Yun in the academic history.And it should be the primary material with Songba script of Wang Yun supplemented in studying Wang Yun,not the other way around.

关 键 词：宋跋本王韵 敦煌本王韵 广韵 声韵 

分 类 号：H113.3[语言文字—汉语]