检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:肖洪泳[1] Xiao Hong - yong
机构地区:[1]湖南大学法学院
出 处:《民间法》2024年第2期357-375,共19页
摘 要:黄宗智认为中国传统法律在经受近百年的沉重打击后,当代中国法学出现了传统与现实、理论与实践上的脱节。中国法学要走出这一分裂状态或精神困境,就必须从法律实践的视角出发,建立一种实践历史的研究方法。清代民法在表达与实践之间所存在的差距,民国民法从传统法律到现代法律的过渡和转型,以及当代中国民事法律实践的探索,无不需要一种实践历史研究,方能获得理解。只有回到实践历史的立场和方法,中国法学才能摆脱空洞的意识形态之争,摒弃西方化与本土化、理论与经验的对立思维模式,超越历史与现实的隔绝,从而认识和创建出中国法律的现代性。Huang Phllip C.C.believes that after nearly a century of heavy blows to traditional Chinese law,there has been a disconnect between tradition and reality,theory and practice in contemporary Chinese jurisprudence.To get out of this split state or spiritual dilemma,Chinese jurisprudence must establish a practical historical research method from the perspective of legal practice.The gap between the expression and practice of civil law in the Qing Dynasty,the transition and transformation of civil law in the Republic of China from traditional law to modern law,and the exploration of contemporary Chinese civil law practice all require a practical historical study to gain understanding.Only by returning to the standpoint and method of practical history can Chinese jurisprudence get rid of the empty ideological debate,abandon the opposing thinking patterns of westernization and localization,theory and experience,and transcend the isolation of history and reality,thereby recognizing and creating the modernity of Chinese law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117