检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者: 邢温迪(译) 姚远(译)[3,4] Frederick Pollock;Wendi Xing;Yuan Yao
机构地区:[1]不详 [2]美国马里兰大学 [3]南京师范大学法学院 [4]中国法治现代化研究院
出 处:《民间法》2024年第1期385-394,共10页
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“《马克思法律思想考证辞典》编撰”(编号:23BFX002)
摘 要:我们绝不可能对法律规则的主题作出轮廓清晰的划分。相同的事实经常构成两条以上特定规则的主题,并且同时引起相互有别的权利义务组合。我们惯于简略称呼的“法律分类”其实不是事实的划分,而是规则的划分,或者说是事实的法律维度的划分,是形式层面而非质料层面的划分。本文结合罗马法的素材,围绕对人和对物的权利义务、公法和私法、实体法和程序法、人法和物法、总论/总则和分论/分则等经典分类作出翔实讨论,有助于补充当前通行教科书的讨论,以及了解近代英国法理学的思想发展。It is not possible to make any clear-cut division of the subject matter of legal rules.The same facts are often the subject of two or more distinct rules,and give rise at the same time to distinct and different sets of duties and rights.The divisions of law,as we are in the habit of elliptically naming them,are in truth divisions not of facts but of rules,or of the legal aspects of facts.Combining materials from Roman law,this article provides an informative discussion around the typical classifications of rights and obligations in personam and in rem,public and private law,substantive and procedural law,law of persons and law of things,and the general part and the special part,which will help to supplement the discussions in the currently prevailing textbooks,as well as to understand the intellectual development in modern English jurisprudence.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222