检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国宏观经济研究院能源研究所,北京100038 [2]中国可再生能源学会风能专委会,北京100013
出 处:《中国能源》2024年第12期5-14,共10页Energy of China
摘 要:根据建设全国统一电力市场体系的要求,我国明确到2030年新能源全面参与市场交易。近两年随着新能源发电装机和发电量迅速增加,新能源参与市场进程加快,在电量消纳和电价收益上面临诸多原因导致的不确定性。本文重点从与电力市场匹配和结合的角度,对比分析差价合约和底价保障两种政府授权合约制度的优势和需要解决的问题,提出通过这两种制度为新能源参与电力市场提供基本收益,以及在电力现货和中长期市场保障新能源优先交易和出清的政策提供建议。According to the requirements of building a national unified power market system,China has proposed that new energy will fully enter power market by 2030.In the past two years,with the rapid increase of installed capacity and power generation of wind power and PV,new energy entering power market has accelerated,and the uncertainty caused by many factors has been faced in the power consumption and price.This paper compares and analyzes the advantages and problems to be solved of CfD and price guarantee mechanisms,focused on combining and matching China power market.The suggestions of mechanism implementation are put forward,in the aspects of providing basic benefits for new energy in power market through these two government-authorized mechanisms,and ensuring priority trading and clearing of new energy in the spot market and medium-long-term market.
分 类 号:TM73[电气工程—电力系统及自动化] F426.61[经济管理—产业经济]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7