区分制视野下过失共同正犯的证立  

作　　者：姚航 

机构地区：[1]浙江警察学院法律系

出　　处：《荆楚法学》2024年第6期45-55,共11页Jingchu Law Review

摘　　要：单一正犯概念与基于因果关系的归责理论密切相关,将每个归责都追溯至个人,而这无法有效解决多人过失的复杂场景。该说试图以疑罪从无简化过失共同正犯所遇到的问题,既无视法条可能存在的解释空间,也无法为司法实践提供理论支撑。行为规范最终是指向个别人的命令或禁止,过失犯与故意犯一样都是对行为规范的违反。在过失犯领域应采取限制正犯概念,过失正犯与参与不仅客观上存在,而且可以进行区分。直接风险和间接风险可以作为两者区分的标准,两者在结果不法上是一致的,在行为不法上有所区别。过失共同正犯中,数行为人通过共同行为决意形成了共同行动计划,从而进行共同的风险制造,产生一种整体归责效果。The notion of a single perpetrator is closely related to the theory of attribution based on causation,and tracing each attribution to an individual cannot effectively address the complex scenario of multiple negligence,with questionable recourse to psychological causation.This statement attempts to simplify the problems encountered in negligent co-perpetrators with the benefit of the doubt,disregarding both the interpretive space that may exist in the statute and the failure to provide theoretical support for judicial practice.behavioural norms are ultimately commands or prohibitions directed to an individual,and negligence,like intent,is a violation of behavioural norms.Concept of restricted offender should be adopted in the field of negligence,negligent criminality and participation not only objectively exists,but also can be distinguished,direct risk and indirect risk can be used as a criterion for the distinction between the two,the two are same in the result unlawful and different in the act unlawful.In the case of negligent joint criminality,several actors form a common plan of action through a joint behavioural decision,thus engaging in a common risk creation,which produces an overall attribution effect.

关 键 词：过失共同正犯 单一正犯 限制正犯 行为规范 溯责禁止 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]