韩国学习者汉语量化否定辖域解读与加工研究  

Interpretation and processing of Chinese quantified negative sentences by Korean-speaking learners

作　　者：王佳 WANG Jia

机构地区：[1]南京大学海外教育学院

出　　处：《世界汉语教学》2025年第2期273-288,共16页Chinese Teaching in the World

基　　金：江苏省社会科学基金青年课题“界面互动视角下汉语二语否定辖域加工机制研究”(23YYC004);国家社科基金重大项目“对标国际中文教育的二语习得理论创新研究”(23&ZD320)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：汉语中全量宾语否定句(如“小李没有参加所有的考试”)存在辖域歧义,包括表层辖域的部分否定和逆序辖域的全量否定。与汉语不同,韩语同类句式偏好表层辖域的全量否定解读。本研究通过自定步速阅读与真值判断任务,考察了59名韩国学习者和21名母语者对汉语量化否定句的解读与加工。结果发现,汉语母语者接受两种解读,在实时加工中表现出表层辖域优势;韩国学习者受母语迁移影响,整体偏好逆序辖域的全量否定解读,但在实时加工中,处于早期阶段的学习者表现出表层辖域优势,反映了启发式加工策略的作用。个体分析显示,部分在华居住时间更长的汉语学习者成功习得了两种辖域解读,支持界面假说关于句法-语义界面知识可最终习得的假设。Chinese negative sentences with the universally quantified object NP(e.g.,Xiaoli meiyou canjia suoyou-de kaoshi,‘Li did not take all the exams.')are ambiguous in negation scope,including the partial-set interpretation(not>■)and the full-set interpretation(■>not),whereas in Korean,the full-set interpretation is the dominant.Adopting a self-paced reading task combined with truth-value judgment,the present study examines the interpretation and processing of such Chinese sentences by 59 Korean-speaking learners of Chinese as well as 21 Chinese native speakers as the control group.The results reveal Chinese natives'high acceptance of both readings and an advantage in surface scope processing.In contrast,L2 learners demonstrate predominant preference for the full-set interpretation due to L1 linguistic transfer,and early-stage learners show a processing benefit for interpreting sentences in their surface scope,suggesting the influence of the heuristic-driven strategy.Further examination of individual data demonstrates that some learners with extended length of stay in China have acquired both readings of the target structure,thereby lending support to the Interface Hypothesis'claim that knowledge at the syntactic-semantic interface can ultimately be acquired.

关 键 词：韩国学习者 汉语量化否定辖域 界面假说 

分 类 号：H195[语言文字—汉语]