论法教义学对环境法学的双重桎梏及其变革  

On the Dual Methodological Constraints of Legal Dogmatics on Environmental Law and Its Transformative Reconstruction

作　　者：万知涵 Wan Zhihan(School of Law,Hunan Normal University,Changsha,Hunan 410081)

机构地区：[1]湖南师范大学法学院,湖南长沙410081

出　　处：《重庆社会科学》2025年第3期148-160,共13页Chongqing Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目“公私法协动视野下生态环境损害救济机制体系化研究”(21CFX076)。

摘　　要：法教义学是环境法学中重要的方法论工具,其构造却与环境法学互生龃龉。其一,法教义学的预设前提赋予了其闭合的性格,而环境法学本质却是开放的。此间桎梏在于,如何在闭合和开放的对立下实现新价值向环境法教义的转换。其二,环境法学时刻处于超越法律的情境中,但法教义学却并未形成具备方法论意义的解释方法。解释方法桎梏的实质在于对环境问题的因果关系进行了筛选。那些被剔除的因果关系,恰好是超越法律情境的缔造者。当法教义学桎梏了环境法学的发展,如何消弭桎梏即成为应有之义。为此,需要构建“新价值—教义”的稳定转换机制,再以环境因果律为基础重新认识环境问题,并以此为起点重塑解释方法。Legal Dogmatics serves as a pivotal methodological instrument in Environmental Law,yet its structural configuration remains inherently incompatible with the discipline's normative framework.First,the axiomatic presuppositions underpinning Legal Dogmatics endow it with a hermeneutically closed system,diametrically opposed to Environmental Law's normatively open-ended nature.The core dilemma lies in reconciling this systemic closure with the discipline's need to accommodate novel normative inputs,necessitating the development of mechanisms for value-translation between extra-legal norms and doctrinal constructs.Second,Environmental Law operates within translegal contexts characterized by complex ecological interconnections,yet Legal Dogmatics lacks specialized hermeneutical techniques capable of addressing such systemic complexities.The methodological deficit arises from the disciplining of causal relations inherent in doctrinal reasoning,which systematically excludes non-linear ecological causation-precisely the type of causal relationships giving rise to translegal regulatory challenges.To resolve these tensions,two reconstructive strategies are proposed.First,the establishment of a teleological translation mechanism enabling the systematic integration of ecological values into doctrinal frameworks through purposive interpretation.Second,the adoption of an ecological causation model as a foundational interpretive principle,capable of capturing the multiscalar and non-linear causalities peculiar to environmental governance.This reconstruction would enable Legal Dogmatics to transcend its positivist limitations while preserving its vital function as a stabilizer of legal certainty in Environmental Law.

关 键 词：法教义学 环境法学 预设前提 解释方法 环境因果律 

分 类 号：D912.6[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]