检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王卫东[1] 曾远 WANG Weidong;ZENG Yuan(School of Management,Northwest University of Political Science and Law,Xi’an 710063,China)
出 处:《重庆理工大学学报(社会科学)》2025年第3期157-164,共8页Journal of Chongqing University of Technology(Social Science)
基 金:西北政法大学数字治理研究中心“十四五”重点课题“数据确权相关问题研究”(XFD-SZ2406)。
摘 要:数据权属不明是数据市场形成的关键阻碍,但数据确权至今仍争议不断。回溯数据确权的争议观点,并就数据确权的难点问题展开讨论。研究发现,数据确权面临产权划定的主体矛盾、产权实现的技术限制和产权利用的市场风险等问题。鉴于数据需求的激增和流动性瓶颈,加强数据确权工作显得尤为重要。然而,考虑到技术限制与数据利用难题,政策应聚焦于促进数据的广泛利用与安全流通,转变确权思维。具体而言,一要通过数据产权登记,推动数据入市;二要加速构建可信数据空间,强化技术支撑;三要探索分阶段价值评估路径,聚焦价值分配的公平性问题。Unclear ownership of data is a key obstacle to the formation of a data market,and the issue of data rights confirmation remains controversial even today.This article examines the controversial and complex issues surrounding data rights confirmation.The research finds that data rights confirmation faces several challenges,including the contradiction in defining property rights,technical limitations in realizing them,and market risks in utilizing them.Given the surging demand for data and the bottleneck in data liquidity,strengthening data rights confirmation is particularly important.However,considering the technical limitations and the challenges in data utilization,policies should focus on promoting the extensive utilization and secure circulation of data,and change the approach to rights confirmation.Specifically,first,data property rights registration should be promoted to facilitate the entry of data into the market;secondly,the construction of a trusted data space should be accelerated to enhance technical support;thirdly,a phased value assessment path should be explored,focusing on fairness in value distribution.
分 类 号:F49[经济管理—产业经济] D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13