检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋丽媛[1] SONG Li-Yuan(Tianjin Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital,Tianjin 300100,China)
机构地区:[1]天津市中西医结合医院(天津市南开医院),天津300100
出 处:《中国中西医结合外科杂志》2025年第2期267-270,共4页Chinese Journal of Surgery of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine
摘 要:目的:研究结肠镜检查前使用复方聚乙二醇电解质散(PEG-ELS)与硫酸镁对肠道清洁程度和患者依从性的影响。方法:回顾性选取2023年1月—2023年12月就诊于天津市南开医院内镜中心、经社区筛查便潜血呈阳性需进一步行结肠镜检查的患者作为研究对象。根据患者使用不同的肠道清洁剂分为PEG-ELS组(n=500)和硫酸镁组(n=500),使用波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)评估两组患者肠道准备质量,采用视野清晰度评分法评估肠道气泡量,采用问卷调查法对患者依从性和舒适度进行评分。结果:与PEG-ELS组比较,硫酸镁组BBPS评分升高,气泡量评分降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。PEG-ELS组的总依从度高于硫酸镁组(95%vs 74%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。硫酸镁组口服药物及水的总量显著高于PEG-ELS组,硫酸镁的口感比PEG-ELS更难以接受,患者服用硫酸镁后排便显著频繁,中重度腹痛比例较高,总睡眠时间显著降低,睡眠期间清醒次数显著增多,入睡后清醒时间显著增长,差异有统计学意义。结论:PEG-ELS与硫酸镁各有优缺点,硫酸镁肠道清洁效果好,镜下清晰,但患者安全性、舒适度和依从性低于PEG-ELS。Objective To investigate the effects of compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution(PEG-ELS)and magnesium sulfate on bowel cleansing efficacy and patient compliance.Methods Patients undergoing colonoscopy at Nankai Hospital,Tianjin,from January 2023 to December 2023,were retrospectively selected as study subjects.They were divided into two groups based on the bowel preparation agent used:the PEG-ELS group(n=500)and the magnesium sulfate group(n=500).The quality of bowel preparation was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale(BBPS).Additionally,the clarity of the visual field was evaluated using a bubble scoring method,while patient compliance and comfort were assessed through questionnaires.Results Compared to the PEG-ELS group,the magnesium sulfate group showed significantly higher BBPS scores and reduced bubble presence(P<0.05).The overall compliance of the PEG-ELS group was higher than that of the magnesium sulfate group(95%vs 74%,P<0.05).However,patients in the magnesium sulfate group reported poorer taste,higher oral medication and water intake,more severe abdominal pain and bloating,increased frequency of bowel movements,reduced sleep duration,and more sleep disturbances(P<0.05).Conclusion Both PEG-ELS and magnesium sulfate have their advantages and limitations.Magnesium sulfate provides superior bowel cleansing and clearer visual fields during colonoscopy but is associated with lower patient safety,comfort,and compliance compared to PEG-ELS.PEG-ELS,while gentler and more palatable,results in more bubbles under the microscope and slightly lower cleansing efficacy.For elderly or frail patients with underlying health conditions,PEG-ELS may be a preferable option for bowel preparation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7