检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马楚懿 MA Chu-yi(Wuhan University,Wuhan 430061,China)
出 处:《哈尔滨学院学报》2025年第3期58-62,共5页Journal of Harbin University
摘 要:垄断纠纷可否仲裁是长期以来困扰我国理论界与实务界的一道难题。在法理基础方面,垄断纠纷依法属于可仲裁的纠纷,通过仲裁解决垄断纠纷符合社会公共利益原则,且不违背《反垄断法》立法目的。在现实依据方面,不断增长的垄断纠纷数量对引入仲裁的止争方式提出新需要,且仲裁的独特优势能为垄断纠纷的解决提供新路径。承认垄断纠纷可仲裁性是国际趋势,有利于保护社会公共利益及消费者权益。我国应当完善涉垄断纠纷的相关仲裁制度,构建司法对垄断纠纷的全面审查,为制度初建保驾护航。The question of whether monopoly disputes can be arbitrated has long been a dilemma for both the theoretical and practical circles in China.From a legal theoretical perspective,monopoly disputes are legally classified as arbitrable disputes.Resolving monopoly disputes through arbitration aligns with the principle of public interest and does not contradict the legislative purpose of the“Anti Monopoly Law”.In terms of practical considerations,the increasing number of monopoly disputes has created a new demand for arbitration as a means of dispute resolution,and the unique advantages of arbitration can provide new pathways for resolving these disputes.Recognizing the arbitrability of monopoly disputes is an international trend that is conducive to protecting public interest and consumer rights.China should improve the relevant arbitration systems related to monopoly disputes and establish comprehensive judicial review for these disputes to safeguard the initial establishment of the system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90