业界创新何以跃升为国家政策?——以“政策方案可采纳性”为中心视角的研究  

How Does Industry-Led Innovation Ascend to National Policy?A Study Centered on the“Adoptability of Policy Proposals”Perspective

作　　者：陈杰 石曼卿[1] Jie Chen;Manqing Shi

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学国际与公共事务学院 [2]上海交通大学中国城市治理研究院

出　　处：《公共行政评论》2025年第2期144-164,199,200,共23页Journal of Public Administration

基　　金：国家自然科学基金面上项目“共同富裕导向下的住房相对贫困治理:测度、机制、效应与长效治理机制构建”(72474131);国家自然科学基金面上项目“中国城镇住房制度变迁对居民福祉的影响研究:理论机制、效应评估与政策优化”(71974125)。

摘　　要：尊重基层首创精神是我国改革开放以来各项事业取得成功的重要原因之一。近年来,源于市场主体的“业界创新”正在成为公共政策创新的重要来源。论文聚焦“物业服务+养老服务”从商业模式创新演化为国家公共政策创新的全过程,运用“政策场域-关键行动者-行动策略-政策方案”的理论分析框架,以政策方案可采纳性为中心视角,将“物业服务+养老服务”跃升为国家政策的全过程分解为创新初始扩散、政策议程和政策正式酝酿3个阶段,在每个阶段分别检视了关键行动者如何扮演政策企业家,如何通过行动策略对方案进行持续的迭代优化,形塑有利的政策场域,从而增进业界创新跃升为政策创新的可能性。研究进一步发现,关键行动者通过“公共价值合供”的价值逻辑、“体制网络化嵌入”的行动逻辑和“保持部门利益平衡”的行政逻辑分别实现了方向可认同性、概念可认可性、内容可接受性和部门可通过性,从而确保了政策方案最终具备可采纳性。Respect for grassroots innovation has been a critical factor in the success of various endeavors since the reform and opening-up in China.In recent years,industry-led innovation has emerged as an important source of public policy innovation.This paper focuses on the evolution of“Property management corporations providing home-community elderly care services(PMES)”from a business model innovation to a national-level public policy innovation.Utilizing a theoretical framework of“policy filed-key actors-action strategies-policy proposals”and adopting the“adoptability of policy proposals”as a central perspective,the study dissects the entire process by which PMES ascended to national policy into three stages:the initial diffusion of innovation,the policy agenda stage,and the formal policy formulation stage.In each stage,the paper examines how key actors acted as policy entrepreneurs,engaging in iterative interactions with action strategies and proposals,shaping a favorable policy filed,and thereby increasing the likelihood of commercial ideas evolving into viable policy proposals.The study further reveals that key actors facilitated the adoptability of the policy proposals through the“co-supply of public value”as a value logic,the“institutional network embedding”as an action logic,and the“balancing of departmental interests”as an administrative logic.These mechanisms ensured the directionality,conceptual acceptability,content feasibility,and inter-departmental accessibility of the policy,ultimately ensuring that the policy proposal was adoptable.

关 键 词：业界创新 政策创新 “物业服务+养老服务” 政策方案可采纳性 政策场域 

分 类 号：D63[政治法律—政治学]