社会团结的转型与竞争性秩序的建构——基于对涂尔干“社会团结”理论的解读  

The Transformation of Social Solidarity and the Construction of Competitive Order——An Interpretation Based on Durkheim’s Theory of Social Solidarity

作　　者：韩明轩 HAN Ming-xuan(Northeast Forestry University,Harbin 150040,China)

机构地区：[1]东北林业大学文法学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150040

出　　处：《当代教研论丛》2025年第3期13-17,共5页contemporary Teaching and Research

基　　金：东北林业大学大学生国家级创新训练项目:人民城市视域下“网红城市”地域认同的建构路径研究——以哈尔滨市为例(202410225005)。

摘　　要：作为涉及社会秩序建构与运作逻辑的动力、保障、调解的理论体系,社会团结理论对当前我国社会建构可调节性竞争秩序具有重要的参考价值。基于此,文章立足涂尔干的社会团结理论,探讨其社会分工差异所导致的社会团结类型和彼此的互构关系。文章认为从失范走向善治的社会秩序需要回溯社会团结类型变迁的内在机制,同时要在现代分工的基础上做到个体、国家与可调节竞争秩序三者的互嵌,方可在实践中达致可调节竞争秩序的建成。同时,这一机制的有效构建和运行也必须克服两者在理论产生背景和方法论基础上的异同,最终为探索适切的基层社会治理现代化模式研究提供理论借鉴。As a theoretical system encompassing the dynamic forces,safeguards,and mediating mechanisms underlying the construction and operational logic of social order,Durkheim’s theory of social solidarity holds significant referential value for establishing regulatable competitive order in contemporary Chinese society.This study conducts a theoretical excavation through Durkheim’s framework,systematically examining the typology of social solidarity arising from differentiated social division of labor and their mutual construction relationships.The research posits that the transition from anomie to good governance in social order requires retracing the endogenous mechanisms of solidarity type evolution.It further emphasizes the necessity of achieving interembeddedness among individuals,the state,and regulatable competitive order through modern labor division,thereby actualizing the construction of such order in practice.Moreover,effective institutional design must dialectically address the theoretical and methodological divergences in their foundational paradigms,ultimately providing theoretical insights for exploring appropriate modernization models of grassroots social governance.

关 键 词：涂尔干 社会团结 可调节 竞争 秩序 

分 类 号：C41[社会学] C42