检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:羿九火 于维轩 王宏朝 张荣宁 YI Jiuhuo;YU Weixuan;WANG Hongchao;ZHANG Rongning(Technical Publication Department,Shanghai Aircraft Customer Service Co.,Ltd.,Shanghai 200241,China)
机构地区:[1]上海飞机客户服务有限公司技术出版物部,上海200241
出 处:《航空工程进展》2025年第2期196-201,共6页Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering
摘 要:目前我国民用飞机维修手册验证工作的研究主要集中在验证方法、验证流程、质量管控等方面,关于维修手册程序修订后操作验证需求的评估鲜有相关准则和流程,亟需开展相关研究。通过分析部分维修手册程序修订内容是否需要提出操作验证需求及原因,同时结合国产某民用飞机试飞和运营阶段手册验证相关经验,归纳总结出飞机维修程序修订后操作验证需求的评估准则和流程,并进行应用实例验证。结果表明:概述、安全注意事项等内容在修订后无需提出操作验证需求,接近方式和测试逻辑等内容在修订后需要提出操作验证需求,能够为手册编写人员和手册验证人员做出判断提供便利。At present,researches on verification of civil aircraft maintenance manuals are focused on verification method,verification flow,quality control and so on.There are no relevant criteria and flow of on-object verifica-tion requirement of revised civil aircraft maintenance procedure,thus some researches are urgent needed.Evalua-tion criteria and flow of on-object verification requirement of revised civil aircraft maintenance procedure are con-cluded and summarized by analyzing whether the revised contents of maintenance procedures need to propose an onobject verification requirement or not,and in combination with manual verification experiences during flight test and operation of civil aircraft,also verified with instance.The results show that revision of common information,safety conditions etc.need not propose an on-object verification requirement,but revision of access method,test logic etc,should propose an on-object verification requirement.It will provide convenience for those who write and veri-fy the maintenance manuals,when they make judgment.
关 键 词:民用飞机 维修手册 程序修订后操作验证需求 评估准则 评估流程
分 类 号:V267[航空宇航科学与技术—航空宇航制造工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49