检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张融[1] 黄思乐 ZHANG Rong;HUANG Sile(School of Law,Guangxi Normal University,Guilin 541006,China)
出 处:《镇江高专学报》2025年第2期53-59,共7页Journal of Zhenjiang College
基 金:2020年广西哲学社会科学规划研究课题(20FFX007)。
摘 要:随着个人拥有的网络虚拟财产日益增多,网络虚拟财产价值认定成为司法实践中无法回避的问题。目前网络虚拟财产价值认定方法主要包括运营商定价法、网络用户定价法、市场定价法和第三方机构定价法。通过分析发现,现有价值认定方法存在适用局限。从网络虚拟财产价值形成机制来看,其价值深受劳动要素与市场要素影响,故对其价值进行评估,不仅要考虑生产网络虚拟财产的劳动投入成本,而且要考虑纠纷发生时的市场供需关系。With the increasing number of online virtual assets owned by individuals,the determination of the value of online virtual assets has become an unavoidable issue in judicial practice.At present,the methods for determining the value of online virtual assets mainly include operator pricing method,network user pricing method,market pricing method,and third-party institution pricing method.Analysis has found that existing value determination methods have limitations in their applicability.From the perspective of the formation mechanism of the value of online virtual assets,the value is deeply influenced by labor and market factors.Therefore,in evaluating the value,the labor input cost of producing online virtual assets and the market supply and demand relationship at the time of disputes should be both considered.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7