检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈文 江媛 李敏 杨麟 孙瑜针 张瑶[2] 丁琳琳 Chen Wen;Jiang Yuan;Li Min(Medical Service Center of Sichuan Province,Chengdu,Sichuan 610041,China)
机构地区:[1]四川省医疗卫生服务指导中心,四川成都610041 [2]成都医学院第一附属医院,四川成都610500 [3]成都市第七人民医院,四川成都610299
出 处:《四川医学》2025年第3期342-345,共4页Sichuan Medical Journal
基 金:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所“公立医院精细化管理与评价研究”项目(编号:NIHA23JXH070)。
摘 要:目的了解新的评审标准模式下四川省医院评审的现状与问题。方法对四川省2021~2023年参加过医院评审的80家三级综合医院进行问卷调查和对成都、川东、川西、川南、川北5个片区15家医院开展线上线下相结合的调研座谈。结果①三段式评审模式的合理性获得了广泛认同,能够有效促进医院高质量发展。②监测数据的质量与医院信息化建设及指标理解密不可分。③评审员“同质化”水平有待进一步提高。结论可通过提高评审信息化管理,开展监测指标解读培训、增加医院管理指导、增加评审信息沟通渠道等来促进评审工作有效开展。通过加强现有评审专家库的规范管理、加强评审员交流与合作、建立评审员跨省域共享机制、完善评审路径等方式提高评审员“同质化”水平。Objective To understand current situation and issues of hospital accreditation in Sichuan Province under the new accreditation standards model.Methods From 2021 to 2023,questionnaire survey among 80 tertiary general hospitals that participated in hospital accreditation were conducted in Sichuan Province,and a combined online and offline research discussion were carried out with 15 hospitals in five regions including Chengdu,Eastern Sichuan,Western Sichuan,Southern Sichuan,and Northern Sichuan.Results The rationality of three-stage accreditation model had been widely recognized and could effectively promote high-quality development of hospitals.The quality of monitoring data was closely related to hospital information construction and understanding of indicators.Homogenization of accreditation evaluators needed to be further improved.Conclusion By enhancing information management of review process,conducting training on monitoring indicator interpretation,increasing guidance on hospital management,and expanding channels for communication of review information,effectiveness of review work could be promoted.To improve homogenization of reviewers,it would be necessary to strengthen standardized management of the existing expert pool,enhance communication and cooperation among reviewers,establish a cross-provincial sharing mechanism for reviewers,and improve the review pathways.
分 类 号:R197.3[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7