检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周文 Wen Zhou(School of Humanities and Law,Southwest Forestry University,Kunming Yunnan)
机构地区:[1]西南林业大学文法学院,云南昆明
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2025年第1期19-25,共7页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:人工智能在司法领域中的深度应用,有效缓解了当前司法体系中“案多人少”的突出矛盾,同时为解决“同案不同判”的难题提供了全新思路。然而,人工智能在司法审判中的应用尚处于起步阶段,其在具体实践中仍面临着技术难题不易攻克、冲击法官主体地位、侵犯当事人诉讼权利等诸多风险和挑战。故亟需在技术规制、基本立场及权利保障三个层面提出具体的优化路径,旨在未来的“人机协作”模式下,充分发挥人工智能的应用潜能和辅助功能,建立以法官为主体、人工智能为辅助的司法审判体系,为人工智能在司法审判中的健康有序发展提供有力保障。The in-depth application of artificial intelligence in the judicial field alleviates the contradiction of“more cases but fewer judges”and offers a new solution to“different judgments for the same case”.However,its application in judicial trials is still in the early stages and faces risks like technical problems,impacts on judges’status,and infringements on litigants’rights.Thus,specific optimiza-tion paths at three levels of technical regulation,basic stance,and rights protection are needed to fully play its potential and function in the“human-machine collaboration”model,establish a judi-cial trial system with judges as the main body and artificial intelligence as the auxiliary,ensuring its healthy and orderly development.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117