三生“空间-功能”耦合视角下村庄分类与规划策略研究——以重庆市巴南区为例  

Study on Village Classification and Planning Strategy from Coupling Perspective of“Production-Living-Ecology”“Space-Function”——A Case Study of Banan District of Chongqing

作　　者：刘燕[1,2] 邓德凡 何汇域 何星 曹伟 LIU Yan;DENG Defan;HE Huiyu;HE Xing;CAO Wei(School of Geographical Sciences,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715,China;Chongqing Institute of Surveying and Monitoring for Planning and Natural Resources/Key Laboratory of Monitoring,Evaluation and Early Warning of Territorial Spatial Planning Implementation,Ministry of Natural Resources,Chongqing 401147,China;Yunnan Province Tengchong Science and Technology Association,Tengchong Yunnan 679100,China;School of Spatial Planning and Design,Hangzhou City University,Hangzhou 310015,China)

机构地区：[1]西南大学地理科学学院,重庆400715 [2]重庆市规划和自然资源调查监测院/自然资源部国土空间规划监测评估预警重点实验室,重庆401147 [3]云南省腾冲市科学技术协会,云南腾冲679100 [4]浙大城市学院国土空间规划学院,杭州310015

出　　处：《西南大学学报(自然科学版)》2025年第4期29-40,共12页Journal of Southwest University(Natural Science Edition)

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(42471290);西南大学创新研究2035先导计划项目(SWU Pilot Plan031);重庆市自然科学基金面上项目(CSTB2022NSCQ-MSX1628);金佛山国家野外站2024年度开放基金项目(JFS2024A01)。

摘　　要：乡村“三生”空间表征村庄的用地资源,“三生”功能反映村庄的发展基础,两者的耦合协调对村庄可持续发展至关重要。基于三生“空间—功能”耦合视角,以重庆市巴南区为例,对巴南区158个行政村分别从“三生”空间视角和“三生”功能视角进行村庄类型划分并在此基础上进行“空间—功能”耦合关系分析,结合分析结果提炼出优势功能强化发展型村、“三生”功能均衡发展型村、核心功能集聚提升型村和“三生”功能全面提升型村4种类型,进而针对不同类型提出差异化规划策略。研究结果表明:①从“三生”空间视角划分,巴南区有生产空间主导型村54个,生活空间主导型村34个,生态空间主导型村70个。②从“三生”功能视角划分,巴南区有生态功能优势村27个,生活功能优势村20个,生态功能优势村21个,其他类型村90个。③从三生“空间—功能”耦合视角划分,巴南区有优势功能强化发展型村26个,“三生”功能均衡发展型村24个,核心功能集聚提升型村84个,“三生”功能全面提升型村24个。④优势功能强化发展型村要注重个性化、特色化发展,“三生”功能均衡发展型村要加强多元化功能协调发展,核心功能集聚提升村要促进空间功能转型发展,“三生”功能全面提升村要坚持逐步稳定发展。The rural“production-living-ecology”space represents the land resources of the village,and the“production-living-ecology”function reflects the development foundation of the village.The coupling and coordination of the space and function of“production-living-ecology”is very important for the sustainable development of the village.Taking Banan District of Chongqing as an example,and administrative village as a unit,this study analyzes the“space-function”coupling relationship of 158 administrative villages in Banan District based on the classification of village types from the perspective of“production-living-ecology”space and“production-living-ecology”function,respectively.Based on the analysis results,villages were extracted into four types:villages with enhanced advantages and functions,villages with balanced“production-living-ecology”functions,villages with concentrated core functions and villages with“production-living-ecology”functions comprehensively promoted.Then differentiated planning strategies for different types of villages were put forward.The results showed that:①From the perspective of“production-living-ecology”space,Banan District has 54 production space dominated villages,34 living space dominated villages and 70 ecological space dominated villages.②From the perspective of“production-living-ecology”function,there are 27 villages with ecological function advantages,20 villages with life function advantages,21 villages with ecological function advantages and 90 villages with other types in Banan District.③According to the results of“space-function”coupling of“production-living-ecology”,the Banan District has 26 villages with enhanced advantages and functions,24 villages with balanced“production-living-ecology”functions,84 villages with concentrated core functions and 24 villages with“production-living-ecology”function comprehensively promoted.④Villages with enhanced advantages and functions should pay attention to personalized and charac

关 键 词：“三生”空间 村庄多功能 实用性村庄规划 “空间—功能”耦合 巴南区 

分 类 号：F301.23[经济管理—产业经济]