检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王钢[1] WANG Gang
机构地区:[1]清华大学法学院,北京100084
出 处:《政治与法律》2025年第4期65-80,共16页Political Science and Law
摘 要:关于赌博的社会学、医学和心理学研究证明,问题赌博会对赌博者、其身边的相关重要他人以及社会共同体造成广泛而持续的严重损害。刑法中的赌博犯罪旨在限制赌博机会的可获得性和可利用性、防止国民形成赌博癖好,通过预防问题赌博有效控制赌博行为的危害性,从而维护社会共同体的平稳存续。个人财产保护说、国家财政收入保障说、善良风俗说、社会秩序说(次生危害说和经济犯罪说)对于赌博犯罪保护法益的界定均不准确。基于赌博瘾癖预防说的立场,在判断互联网娱乐平台是否涉嫌赌博犯罪时,应当考察其经营模式是否形成了“充值—概率玩法—变现”的涉赌模型,是否使用户可以凭借偶然性轻易获取财产利益,从而具有诱发问题赌博的危险。Sociological,medical and psychological research on gambling has shown that problem gambling can cause extensive,lasting and serious damage to gamblers,concerned significant others and the social community.The provisions on gambling-based crimes in the criminal law aim to limit the availability and accessibility of gambling opportunities,prevent citizens from developing gambling habits,and effectively mitigate the harm of gambling by preventing problem gambling,thereby maintaining the stability of the social community.The individual property protection theory,the national fiscal revenue guarantee theory,the public morality theory,and the social order theory(secondary harm theory and economic crime theory)fail to accurately define the legal interests protected by criminal provisions on gambling-based crimes.Based on the standpoint of the gambling addiction prevention theory,in assessing whether an Internet entertainment platform perpetrates a gambling-based offense,it should be examined whether its business model has formed a gambling-related pattern of"recharge—probabilistic gameplay—cash-out",and whether it allows users to easily obtain financial gains by chance,thereby posing the risk of inducing problem gambling.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7