检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢迟[1] Xie Chi(Business School,Hunan Normal University,Consumer Economy Research Institute,Hunan Normal University)
机构地区:[1]湖南师范大学商学院、消费经济研究所,410081
出 处:《经济思想史学刊》2025年第1期116-139,共24页Bulletin of the History of Economic Thought
基 金:湖南省社会科学基金基地项目“发达大国中高收入阶段消费需求规模及其变化规律研究”(批准号:22JD013);湖南省社会科学基金“学术湖南”精品培育项目“绿色消费的激励机制及政策研究”(批准号:24ZDAJ005);湖南省教育厅优秀青年项目“‘双碳’目标下湖南农村绿色消费发展的减排效应与实现路径研究”(批准号:22B0035)阶段性成果。
摘 要:绿色消费是有效化解生态环境问题和人们消费需求增长之间矛盾的新路径,探究中西方绿色消费思想演进规律对于指导绿色消费发展实践具有重要意义。西方绿色消费思想经历了从重点关注消费如何受制于资源水平到重视通过经济措施改善环境污染的演进过程。中国古代绿色消费思想更多强调权衡人的消费需求满足和生态环境保护之间的关系,新时代绿色消费思想则认为生态环境保护和人们更高水平消费需求满足是内在统一、相互促进的。通过中西方绿色消费思想比较,发现中西方绿色消费思想的产生和发展必然受外在经济社会发展水平影响,且其发展的内在要求、经济效应和制度贡献相似,但秉持的价值立场不同。本文得出以下主要结论:中西方绿色消费思想发展大致都经历了节制人对自然资源的过度消耗→提倡资源高效利用→强调绿色消费科学认知的三个阶段,绿色消费思想发展必然与当时的经济、社会、文化及政治制度发展水平相适应,中国绿色消费思想在吸收中西方不同时期绿色消费正确思想的过程中不断发展,中国现代绿色消费思想与西方绿色消费思想的最大区别在于是否坚持以人民为中心。Green consumption is a new path to effectively resolve the contradiction between ecological and environmental problems and the growing demand for consumption.Exploring the evolution of green consumption ideology in both China and the West is of great significance for guiding the development of green consumption practices.The Western ideology of green consumption has evolved from a focus on how consumption is constrained by resource availability to an emphasis on addressing environmental pollution through economic measures.Ancient Chinese green consumption ideology emphasized the balance between meeting human consumption needs and protecting the ecological environment.In the new era,green consumption ideology believes that environmental protection and the fulfillment of higher-level consumption needs are inherently unified and mutually reinforcing.A comparative analysis of Chinese and Western green consumption ideology reveals that its emergence and development are inevitably influenced by external economic and social conditions.Despite similarities in developmental requirements,economic effects,and institutional contributions,the two traditions differ in their underlying value orientations.The main conclusions are as follows.The development of green consumption ideology in both China and the West has roughly gone through three stages:controlling excessive consumption of natural resources,advocating for efficient use of resources,and emphasizing scientific cognition of green consumption.The development of green consumption ideology is inevitably in line with the levels of economic,social,cultural,and political development of its time.Chinese green consumption ideology has continuously evolved by integrating the correct aspects of green consumption ideology from different historical periods in both China and the West.The fundamental difference between modern Chinese green consumption ideology and its Western counterpart lies in whether it adheres to a people-centered approach.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171