检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李朔严 林顺浩 朱颖 LI Shuoyan;Lin Shunhao;Zhu Ying
机构地区:[1]上海大学社会学院 [2]华中农业大学公共管理学院 [3]上海市社会科学事业发展研究中心
出 处:《社会发展研究》2025年第1期206-223,M0007,共19页Journal of Social Development
基 金:上海市哲社青年课题“上海居民参与公益慈善活动的影响因素研究”(项目编号:2020ESH007,主持人:朱颖);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(项目编号:2662025GGQD002,主持人:林顺浩)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:慈善伦理的转型是中国慈善实践的核心问题。本文以一个内生于熟人社会的乡土慈善自组织LS为研究对象,分析了其发展过程中取得的成效和面临的挑战。研究发现,LS组织与基层干部的关系存在张力的原因在于LS组织所依循的慈善逻辑尚未与行政逻辑嵌合起来。随着LS组织的不断发展,这种难以嵌合的情况致使双方无法形成认知共同体。这一发现的启示在于,慈善组织需要在实践中探索恰当的行动路径来实现不同行动者行为逻辑之间的有效嵌合,进而构建认知共同体,为自身的健康发展提供良好的环境。The transformation of charitable ethics is a central issue in Chinese charitable practices. This paper takes LS,a rural charitable self-organization rooted in an acquaintance society,as the research subject,analyzing its achievements and challenges during its development. The study finds that although the charitable logic of the LS organization aligns with the operational mechanisms of the acquaintance society and has gained villagers' recognition, its relationship with the local government is highly strained. The key issue lies in the differences between the charitable logic followed by the LS organization and the administrative logic. As the LS organization continues to develop,these differences become increasingly pronounced,leading to escalating tensions and preventing the formation of a cognitive community between the two parties. The implication of this finding is that charitable organizations need to explore appropriate action paths in practice to effectively integrate the behavioral logics of different actors, thereby constructing a cognitive community and providing a favorable environment for their healthy development.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49