检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王奕文 季为民[2] Yiwen Wang;Weimin Ji(School of Philosophy,Renmin University of China;School of Journalism and Communication,University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences)
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学哲学院 [2]中国社会科学院大学新闻传播学院
出 处:《全球传媒学刊》2025年第1期129-144,共16页Global Journal of Media Studies
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“我国青少年网络舆情的大数据预警体系与引导机制研究”(项目编号:20&ZD013)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:AI为传统新闻伦理提供全新的应用场景,展现出鲜明的技术自主性。在实践维度,自主性表现为AI的技术合理性被资本逻辑异化,引发虚假新闻和个人隐私被侵犯等一系列新闻伦理失范现象。在理论维度,自主性表现为准主体性对新闻客观性原则和封闭主体责任制的冲击。不仅新闻伦理规范了AI新闻实践,AI也在重构新闻伦理的边界与内涵。这种互相建构关系充分体现AI时代新闻伦理被动性与能动性的辩证统一。尊重AI自身发展的规律、扬弃传统新闻伦理不合理成分,是建构人机协同发展的新闻伦理新范式、实现技术向善的必要前提。AI provides a new application scenario for traditional journalism ethics,showing a distinct technical autonomy.In the practical dimension,autonomy is manifested in the fact that the technical rationality of AI has been alienated by the logic of capital,triggering a series of journalistic ethical misconducts such as false news and violation of personal privacy.In the theoretical dimension,autonomy manifests itself in the impact of quasi-subjectivity on the principle of journalistic objectivity and the accountability of closed subjects.Not only does journalism ethics regulate the practice of AI journalism,but AI is also reconstructing the boundaries and connotations of journalism ethics.This mutually constructive relationship fully reflects the dialectical unity of passivity and activeness of journalism ethics in the AI era.Respecting the law of AIs own development and abandoning the unreasonable elements of traditional journalism ethics are the necessary preconditions for constructing a new paradigm of for human-machine collaboration and achieving the goal of technology for good.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117