偏好协调、网络效应与金砖合作的机制化  

Preference Coordination,Network Effects,and the Institutionalization of BRICS Cooperation

作　　者：朱杰进[1] 刘瑛琛 Zhu Jiejin;Liu Yingchen

机构地区：[1]复旦大学国际关系与公共事务学院

出　　处：《俄罗斯东欧中亚研究》2025年第2期21-44,160,161,共26页Russian,East European & Central Asian Studies

基　　金：上海社科基金项目“中国推动全球经济治理制度改革的路径研究”(2020BGJ001)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：作为全球南方的第一方阵,金砖国家在不同议题领域开展合作,其合作的机制化水平存在较大差异。同样是金砖国家之间开展的合作,为什么有的议题领域合作的机制化水平较高,有的议题领域合作的机制化水平中等,而有的议题领域合作的机制化水平却较低?金砖内部核心大国之间的偏好协调程度与合作议题领域的网络效应,共同影响了金砖合作的机制化水平。在开发性金融领域,中国与印度之间的偏好协调程度较高,议题领域的网络效应较弱,使得金砖合作的机制化水平较高。在金融安全网领域,中国与巴西之间的偏好协调程度较高,但议题领域的网络效应却较强,使得金砖合作的机制化水平中等。在传统跨境支付领域,中国与俄罗斯之间的偏好协调程度较低,同时议题领域的网络效应较强,使得金砖合作的机制化水平较低。探讨金砖合作机制化水平的差异及其形成原因,对于深入理解金砖机制建设的理论原理以及如何开展大金砖的机制建设都具有启示意义。一方面,大金砖机制需要更加努力地协调各国的利益偏好,克服分歧,寻找妥协点。另一方面,大金砖机制应秉持循序渐进的机制化建设原则,优先选择那些网络效应较弱的议题领域进行合作,只有这样才能在推动全球治理体系改革中发挥更大作用。As a leading bloc of the Global South,BRICS countries engage in cooperation across diverse issue areas,yet exhibit significant variations in their levels of institutionalization.Why does BRICS cooperation exhibit high institutionalization in some issue areas,moderate in others,and low in others?The institutionalization level of BRICS cooperation is jointly shaped by the degree of preference coordination among core major powers within the bloc and the network effects inherent to specific issue areas.In development finance,the high preference coordination between China and India,coupled with weak network effects in this domain,results in a high level of institutionalization.In financial safety nets,while China and Brazil achieve substantial preference coordination,the strong network effects in this area lead to moderate institutionalization.Conversely,in traditional cross-border payments,the low preference coordination between China and Russia,combined with strong network effects,yields low institutionalization.Exploring the variation in BRICS institutionalization and its causes provides theoretical insights into the logic of BRICS institutional development and practical guidance for advancing the institutionalization of an expanded BRICS.On one hand,the expanded BRICS mechanism must intensify efforts to align member states' preferences,reconcile divergences,and identify compromises.On the other hand,it should adhere to incremental institutionalization,prioritizing cooperation in issue areas with weaker network effects to amplify its role in reforming the global governance system.

关 键 词：金砖合作 偏好协调 网络效应 机制化水平 开发性金融 

分 类 号：F114.4[经济管理—国际贸易]