医药领域受贿犯罪司法认定问题研究  

Research on the Judicial Determination of Bribery Crimes in the Medical Field

作　　者：上海市人民检察院第一分院、闵行区人民检察院联合课题组 肖友广 金华捷 潘若喆 The First Branch of Shanghai People′s Procuratorate(The First Branch of Shanghai People's Procuratorate,Shanghai 200052;Shanghai Minhang District People's Procuratorate,Shanghai 201199)

机构地区：[1]不详 [2]上海市人民检察院第一分院第三检察部 [3]上海市闵行区人民检察院第三检察部

出　　处：《犯罪研究》2025年第1期84-91,共8页Chinese Criminology Review

基　　金：2024年度上海市检察机关创新项目“四方协同、检察一体——深化重大职务犯罪办案基地建设”的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：医药领域的受贿犯罪和传统的受贿犯罪相比,在主体、收受行为、请托事项界定上具有特殊性。在行为人具有双重身份的情况下,应根据其所利用的职务便利的性质,界定主体身份。在区分推广费、讲课费与贿赂款问题上,应从行为主体是否适格以及行为人所付出的劳务是否体现对价这两个方面进行综合评判。受贿犯罪与涉企业渎职犯罪的区分,应判断是否对经营活动具有犯意联络。正常开具处方药的行为可以界定为请托事项,且系不正当利益。通过其他国有医药企业工作人员的职权为请托人提供帮助的,须从是否具有权力支配力、影响力的角度界定是否属于受贿罪中的请托事项。Compared with traditional bribery crimes,bribery crimes in the pharmaceutical field have special characteristics in the definition of the subject,the accepting behavior,and the requested matters.In cases where the perpetrator has dual identities,the subject identity should be defined based on the nature of the convenience of their position.In distinguishing between promotion fees,lecture fees,and bribery payments,a comprehensive evaluation should be made from two aspects:whether the actor is qualified and whether the labor services provided by the actor is proportionate to the consideration.The distinction between bribery crimes and crimes involving corporate malfeasance should be based on whether there is a criminal intent connected to business activities.The normal act of prescribing medication can be defined as a requested matter for authorization,and it is an unfair benefit.If assistance is provided to the client through the authority of other state-owned pharmaceutical enterprise staff,it is necessary to determine whether the requested matter falls under the crime of bribery based on whether it has power and influence.

关 键 词：医药领域 受贿犯罪 经营活动 利用职务上的便利 请托事项 

分 类 号：D924.392[政治法律—刑法学]