论违约获益剥夺的体系定位  

On the Systemic Positioning of Disgorgement of Profits from Breach of Contract

作　　者：林格祺 LIN Geqi

机构地区：[1]暨南大学法学院,广州511443

出　　处：《华南师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2025年第2期190-204,208,共16页Journal of South China Normal University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：暨南大学法学院/知识产权学院拔尖创新人才培养项目“违约损害赔偿计算规则研究”(FXBC2024011)。

摘　　要：《民法典合同编通则解释》第62条中将违约方因违约获得的利益作为法院酌定可得利益的因素之一,当前多有观点认为其可发展为违约获益剥夺规则。对违约获益剥夺体系定位的讨论应当回溯到事物本质。违约获益剥夺若归入无因管理制度下,则会与现有规则发生体系违反。而不当得利的内涵和外延较为宽泛,将违约获益剥夺纳入其中仍有失正当。违约获利的可赔性来自可得利益的可赔性,因此,对于违约获益剥夺的讨论应当回归到损害赔偿的体系。虽然违约获益剥夺一定程度上超出了严格意义的完全赔偿原则的控制,但借助信赖利益和违约方过错程度仍可以找补其合理性。Article 62 of the General Provisions on Contract Law in the Civil Code includes the benefits obtained by the breaching party due to the breach as one of the factors for the court to consider when determining the recoverable benefits.Currently,there are many views suggesting that this can be developed into a rule for the disgorgement of profits from breach of contract.Discussions on the positioning of the disgorgement of profits from breach of contract within the legal system should return to the essence of the matter.If the disgorgement of profits from breach of contract is categorized under the system of management without mandate,it would conflict with existing rules.Given the broad connotations and extensions of unjust enrichment,including the disgorgement of profits from breach of contract under this category remains unjustifiable.The compensability of profits from breach of contract originates from the compensability of recoverable benefits.Therefore,discussions on the disgorgement of profits from breach of contract should return to the system of damages.Although the disgorgement of profits from breach of contract somewhat exceeds the strict control of the principle of full compensation,rationality can still be found through reliance interests and fault.

关 键 词：获益剥夺 无因管理 不当得利 信赖利益 违约损害赔偿 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学]