检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李彤 何敏[1] LI Tong;HE Min(School of Intellectual Property Law,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)
出 处:《广东药科大学学报》2025年第2期125-130,共6页Journal of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University
基 金:国家社科基金一般项目(22BFX150)。
摘 要:中药方剂成果产权化保护是中医药资源市场化开发的重要一环,但目前我国部分中药方剂成果的财产权益难以借助现有民事法律或行政手段保护实现,不利于成果转化与成果创造激励。本文以中药方剂成果为范式样本,通过规范分析、实证研究与比较考察相结合的体系化方法,梳理现行制度框架内各个保护路径对中药方剂成果产权化保护的局限性,进而从时序(长期/短期)、效力(立法/司法)、规范(民事/行政)多维度分层提出体系化保护应对策略,为破解中药方剂成果产权化保护不足的制度难题提供参考。The protection of the property rights of Chinese medicine formulas achievements is an important link in the market-oriented development of Chinese medicine resources.However,part of the property rights and interests of Chinese medicine formulas achievements is difficult to be protected by existing civil laws or administrative means,which is not conducive to the market transformation and stimulating creation.This study took the traditional Chinese medicine formulas as a paradigm sample,aiming at cracking the systematics problems of insufficient protection of property rights of traditional Chinese medicine achievements.Through a systematic approach combining normative analysis,empirical research and comparative study,the limitations of each protection path within the existing institutional framework was sorted out.To provide ideas for solving the problem of insufficient protection of property rights of traditional Chinese medicine achievements,the research put forward a systematic protection solution from the multi-dimensional stratification of the time sequence(long/short-term),effectiveness(legislative/judicial),and norms(civil/administrative).
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90