Evaluation of the measurement properties of online health information quality assessment tools: A systematic review  

在线健康信息质量评价量表测量属性的系统评价

作　　者：Yating Li Hui Ouyang Gan Lin Yichao Peng Jinghui Yao Yun Chen 李雅婷;欧阳慧;林敢;彭毅超;姚京辉;陈云

机构地区：[1]School of Nursing,Southern Medical University,Guangzhou,Guangdong,China [2]Center for Orthopedic Surgery,The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University,Guangzhou,Guangdong,China [3]Department of Outpatient,The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University,Guangzhou,Guangdong,China

出　　处：《International Journal of Nursing Sciences》2025年第2期130-136,I0002,共8页国际护理科学(英文)

基　　金：supported by President Foundation of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University(YH202207)。

摘　　要：Objectives:This study aimed to evaluate the measurement properties and methodological quality of instruments developed to evaluate the quality of online health information.Methods:In this study,a systematic search was conducted across a range of databases,including the China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI),Wanfang,China Science and Technology Journal(VIP),SinoMed,PubMed,Web of Science,CINAHL,Embase,the Cochrane Library,PsycINFO,and Scopus.The search period spanned from the inception of the databases to October 2023.Two researchers independently conducted the literature screening and data extraction.The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments(COSMIN)Risk of Bias checklist.The measurement properties were evaluated using the coSMIN criteria.The modified Grading,Recommendations,Assessment,Development,and Evaluation(GRADE)system was used to determine the quality grade.Results:A total of 18 studies were included,and the measurement properties of 17 scales were assessed.Fifteen scales had content validity,three had structural validity,six had internal consistency,two had test-retest reliability,nine had interater reliability,one had measurement error,six instruments had criterion validity,and three scales had hypotheses testing for construct validity;however,the evaluation of their methodological quality and measurement properties revealed deficiencies.Of these 17 scales,15 were assigned a Level B recommendation,and two received a Level C recommendation.Conclusions:The Health Information Website Evaluation Tool(HIWET)can be temporarily used to evaluate the quality of health information on websites.The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool(PEMAT)can temporarily assess the quality of video-based health information.However,the effectiveness of both tools needs to be further verified.目的评价在线健康信息质量评价量表的测量学属性质量和方法学质量。方法系统检索中国知网、万方、维普、中国生物医学文献数据库、PubMed、Web of Science、CINAHL、Embase等数据库,检索时限为建库至2023年10月。采用COSMIN偏倚风险检查表评估量表的方法学质量,使用COSMIN标准评估量表评价测量学属性,使用改良版定量系统评价证据分级评估质量等级。结果共纳入18项研究,对17个量表的测量学属性进行评价。15个量表报告了内容效度,3个量表报告了结构效度,6个量表报告了内部一致性,2个量表报告了重测信度,9个量表报告了评价者间信度,1个量表报告了测量误差,6个工具报告了校标效度,3个量表报告了结构效度的假设检验,17个量表在方法学质量和测量属性评估方面存在一定的不足,最终有15个量表为B级推荐,2个量表为C级推荐。结论健康信息网站评估工具可暂时用来评估网站上的健康信息质量,患者健康教育材料评估工具可暂时用来评估视频类健康信息质量,但其有效性有待进一步验证。

关 键 词：Consumer health information Data accuracy INTERNET Quality indicators Systematicreview 

分 类 号：R47[医药卫生—护理学]