錢泳藏僞漢石經拓本考——兼論清代石經學與書學的互動  

A Study of Qian Yong's Forged Han Stone Classics rubbings and the Interaction between Stone Classics Studies and Calligraphy Studies in the Qing Dynasty

作　　者：高子倩 GAO Ziqian

机构地区：[1]上海交通大學人文學院

出　　处：《书法研究》2025年第1期83-102,197,198,共22页Chinese Calligraphy Studies

摘　　要：錢泳藏偽漢石經拓本共十三纸,有九紙存世,今藏日本東京國立博物館。錢泳曾稱該本爲雙鈎本,并多次自行翻刻,其所藏、所刻石經可分爲私藏十三纸拓本、翻刻十纸拓本、合刻十三纸拓本、翻刻《學而》篇拓本四種。阮元文選樓藏漢石經残字并非割自錢泳藏本,羅振玉判断有误。錢泳藏本在形制、字形、行列方面均與出土實物不符,全本皆偽,作偽者身份不详。發軔于清代的石經學實则與取法古碑的書學新風同源異流,歷代石經及其拓本被書家視爲可供學習的範本,經學家亦藉助書法知識拓展對石經的認知,兩者互相推助、共同发展。Qian Yong collected thirteen sheets of rubbings of counterfeit Han stone classics.Nine of these are extant and are now at the Tokyo National Museum.Qian Yong once claimed that these rubbings were from copies outlining only the contours of characters,which he personally carved several times.The rubbings collected and carved by Qian Yong can be divided into four types:thirteen sheets which he privately collected,ten sheets of re-carvings,thirteen sheets of assorted carvings,and rubbings of the Xue Er chapter of Analects.The rubbings of Han stone classics collected by Ruan Yuan's Wenxuan House were not from Qian Yong's collection and Luo Zhenyu's judgment on this matter was therefore wrong.The rubbings collected by Qian Yong are inconsistent with the unearthed specimens in terms of appearance,character form shape and arrangement of the text in columns and rows.They all consist of forged inscriptions but the identity of the forger is unknown.Research into the stone classics,which began in the Qing dynasty,and the new calligraphy trend focusing on the study of ancient steles have the same roots but have developed differently.The stone classics and their rubbings are regarded by calligraphers as models and philologists use knowledge of calligraphy to expand their understanding of the stone classics.The two are mutually beneficial and develop together.

关 键 词：錢泳 漢石經 拓本 書學 石經學 

分 类 号：J292.1[艺术—美术]