论组织、指使妨害公司管理秩序之行为的性质及量刑  

On the Nature and Sentencing of Organizing and Instigating Acts that Disrupt Corporate Management Order

作　　者：刘纯燕 Liu Chunyan(Law School of Henan University of Science and Technology,Luoyang,Henan,471000)

机构地区：[1]河南科技大学法学院,河南洛阳471000

出　　处：《山东警察学院学报》2024年第6期38-46,共9页Journal of Shandong Police College

摘　　要：欺诈发行证券罪,违规披露、不披露重要信息罪,背信损害上市公司利益罪等三罪第2款中的组织、指使行为并非共犯正犯化行为,因为它们不能弃置实行从属性而独立成罪。考虑到该三罪第2款的立法原意是加重对此类组织、指使行为的处罚力度,同时考虑到应当尽量避免该三罪第2款成为实际意义甚微的宣示规定,宜认为该三罪第2款关闭了其中控股股东、实际控制人的从犯认定通道。即使实务中可能存在没有达到主要作用程度的组织、指使行为,由于该三罪第2款的法定刑幅度相对宽泛,因而也可以对作用程度不同的组织、指使行为做出量刑上的区别。In cases of securities fraud,violations related to the disclosure or non-disclosure of important information,and breaches of trust harming the interests of listed companies,the organizational and instructive behaviors outlined in Article 2 of these offenses do not constitute principal complicity,as they cannot stand alone as independent crimes beyond their accessory nature.Considering that the legislative intent behind Article 2 is to impose harsher penalties for such organizational and instructive actions,while also aiming to prevent this article from becoming a provision of minimal practical significance,it is reasonable to conclude that Article 2 effectively closes the pathway for recognizing controlling shareholders and actual controllers as accomplices.Even if there are instances of organizational or instructive actions that do not reach a primary level of contribution,the relatively broad statutory sentencing range allows for differentiated sentencing based on the varying degrees of involvement in these actions.

关 键 词：欺诈发行证券罪 违规披露、不披露重要信息罪 背信损害上市公司利益罪 组织 指使 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]