从“存储”到“秒传”的平台版权侵权责任认定  

The Determination of Platform Copyright Infringement Liability from"Storage"to“Instant Upload”

作　　者：熊琦[1] Xiong Qi

机构地区：[1]华中科技大学法学院

出　　处：《中国应用法学》2025年第2期122-130,共9页China Journal of Applied Jurisprudence

摘　　要：由于我国互联网产业高度发达,网络服务提供者在服务类型上的创新层出不穷。为进一步发挥互联网的传播效率优势,网盘服务提供者在作为基础服务类型的信息存储空间服务上附加了“秒传”和“离线下载”等新功能,引发了著作权直接侵权和间接侵权的争议。秒传技术提供的“同类文件合并”存储方式,虽然在外观上是从网盘的存储空间发出下载链接,但分享指令的发出者和分享技术的使用者仍然是用户本人,因此采取新技术的网盘服务提供者并不应该承担直接侵权责任。在间接侵权方面,则应谨慎看待扩张网盘服务提供者过滤和封号等必要措施的要求,恪守既有“避风港”规则、“通知—必要措施”和“知道—必要措施”的规制路径,区分对待商业用户和普通用户。Due to the highly developed Internet industry in China,Internet service providers continuously innovate in their types of services.To further leverage the efficiency advantages of Internet dissemination,cloud storage service providers have introduced new services such as"instant upload"and"offline download"in addition to their basic storage services.These innovations,however,have sparked debates over direct and indirect copyright infringement.Instant upload technology employs a"merge similar files"storage method.In this method,although the download links are issued from the cloud storage space,users themselves initiate the sharing commands and utilize the sharing technology.Therefore,cloud storage service providers utilizing such new technologies should not bear direct infringement liability.Regarding indirect infringement,caution should be exercised when considering requests for expanded necessary measures such as filtering and account suspension.It is crucial to adhere to the existing"safe harbor""notice-and-take-down"and"knowledge-and-takedown"rules,and to differentiate between commercial users and o rdinary users.

关 键 词：信息存储空间服务 “避风港”规则 离线下载 秒传 

分 类 号：D923.41[政治法律—民商法学]