检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曾睿 赵梦霄 胡萌萌 刘欣 常红娟 ZENG Rui;ZHAO Mengxiao;HU Mengmeng;LIU Xin;CHANG Hongjuan(School of Medicine,Wuhan University of Science and Technology,Wuhan(430081),Hubei Province,China)
出 处:《中国学校卫生》2025年第3期358-363,共6页Chinese Journal of School Health
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(81803252);武汉科技大学教学研究项目(2023X046)。
摘 要:目的基于倾向性评分匹配法探讨大学生攻击性行为影响因素及其网络结构,为预防和改善大学生攻击性行为提供精准靶向干预。方法于2023年6月,采用方便抽样方法选取湖北省武汉市3所高校2652名大学生作为研究对象,采用攻击行为量表(BWAQ)、反刍性思维量表(RRS)、中文版认知情绪调节问卷(CERQ-C)、家庭关怀度指数(APGAR)、简明负面恐惧量表(BFNES)进行问卷调查,运用倾向性评分匹配(PSM)进行1∶1匹配,对纳入的大学生进行单因素、多因素Logistic回归分析以及网络分析。结果Logistic回归分析结果显示,反刍性思维倾向越严重、倾向于使用非适应性情绪调节和负面评价恐惧水平越高的大学生更可能出现高攻击性行为(OR值分别为1.14,1.18,1.06),倾向于使用适应性情绪调节和家庭关怀度指数越高的大学生越不易出现高攻击性行为(OR值分别为0.88,0.82)(P值均<0.01)。网络结构在高攻击性行为和低攻击性行为组间差异有统计学意义(M=0.27,P<0.05)。高攻击性行为大学生核心影响因素依次为“强迫思考”“反省深思”和“症状反刍”(EI值分别为3.50,3.49,3.48);低攻击性行为大学生核心影响因素依次为“适应性情绪调节”“成长度”和“非适应性情绪调节”(EI值分别为4.37,4.12,4.08)。结论中国大学生攻击性行为的影响因素在不同行为类型上存在不同特点,应采取针对性的靶向干预以减少大学生攻击性行为的发生。Objective To explore the influencing factors and network structure of aggressive behaviors among college students based on propensity score matching(PSM),so as to provide precise targeted interventions for the prevention and improvement of aggressive behaviors among college students.Methods A total of 2652 college students were selected by convenient sampling method from three colleges in Wuhan,Hubei Province in June 2023.Questionnaire surveys were carried out by using the Buss-Warren Aggression Questionnaire(BWAQ),Ruminative Responses Scale(RRS),Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire-Chinese Version(CERQ-C),Family APGAR Index(APGAR),Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale(BFNES).By bias score matching(PSM)for 1∶1 matching,univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analysis,and network analysis were conducted on the college students.Results College students with higher levels of ruminant thinking,non-adaptive emotional regulation and fear of negative appraisal were more likely to have highly aggressive behaviors(OR=1.14,1.18,1.06),and those with higher adaptive emotional regulation and family care index were more likely to have highly aggressive behaviors(OR=0.88,0.82)(P<0.01).Network structure was significantly different between the two groups(M=0.27,P<0.05).The core affective factors of college students with high levels of aggressive behavior were brooding reflective pondering and symptom rumination(EI=3.50,3.49,3.48),low aggressive behavior college students core affective factors were adaptive emotion regulation growth and non-adaptive emotion regulation(EI=4.37,4.12,4.08).Conclusion Factors affecting Chinese college students'aggressive behaviors are of different characteristics on different behaviour types,and targeted interventions should be adopted to reduce aggressive behaviors of college students.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13