不同语种发表重复内容的出版伦理问题探讨  

Ethical Issues of Publishing Duplicate Content in Different Languages

作　　者：蒋霞[1] 黄崇亚 JIANG Xia;HUANG Chongya(Journal Center,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,200030,Shanghai,China;Journal Center,Xi'an Jiaotong University,710046,Xi'an,China)

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学期刊中心,上海200030 [2]西安交通大学期刊中心,西安710049

出　　处：《科技与出版》2025年第3期157-166,共10页Science-Technology & Publication

摘　　要：变换语种后在科技期刊上发表重复内容的可接受性在出版伦理方面比较复杂,期刊编辑和作者的认知也存在争议。本文通过梳理国内法律法规和国际推荐规范中与出版重复内容有关的规定,从利益相关方角度分析了由此引出的出版伦理问题;结合国内外具体案例,界定不同语种重复发表性质,探讨在保证相关方利益的基础上合法合理地维护学术规范,并从不同利益方角度给出应对思路和处理建议。The issue of publishing duplicate or highly similar content in multiple languages in scientific journals is complex,and its acceptability is subject to certain ethical controversies.Authors often publish the same content in different languages to maximize the dissemination of their work or increase the quantity of their publications.This duplicate form of publication has drawn significant attention from journal editors because of its ethical implications.However,international and domestic publishing standards are not fully unified on this matter,and the different perspectives of journal editors and authors further complicate the issue.In practical publishing activities,ethical dilemmas often involve complex trade-offs,and understanding different ethical viewpoints can help editors address moral challenges more comprehensively.Therefore,it is necessary to discuss the ethical issues of publishing duplicate content in multiple languages.First,this article reviews relevant provisions in copyright laws and academic publishing standards in China,as well as the attitudes and recommendations of international publishing ethics guidelines.It finds that domestic laws lack clear regulations on this issue,whereas international guidelines neither support nor oppose it,whose perspective maintains a neutral stance on the ethical requirements for such situations.The article analyses ethical issues from the perspectives of three stakeholders:authors,journals,and the public.Authors hope to increase the number of their publications and gain more benefits through this approach,but publishing the same content in different languages is usually recognized as independent research achievements,which is unfair in academic evaluation.Owing to the above,several major international publishers,such as Elsevier,Springer Nature,Wiley,and Taylor&Francis,have established their own rules and policies on the basis of their interests and in alignment with the guidelines.Next,by analysing three specific cases of duplicate publications in different lan

关 键 词：重复发表 出版伦理 科技期刊 学术不端 科研诚信 

分 类 号：G237[文化科学]