贵州省首批县域医疗次中心医药服务能力综合评价  

Comprehensive Evaluation of the Medical Service Capacity of the First Batch of County-Level Medical Subcenters in Guizhou Province

作　　者：张可人 金娟 崔杏 朱星月 何迅 燕小凡 Zhang Keren;Jin Juan;Cui Xing;Yan Xiaofan(School of Medical and Health Management,Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Guiyang,Guizhou,550025,China;不详)

机构地区：[1]贵州医科大学医药卫生管理学院,贵州贵阳550025

出　　处：《中国卫生经济》2025年第3期89-93,共5页Chinese Health Economics

基　　金：贵州医科大学医药经济管理研究中心项目(GMU MEM2022-B16)。

摘　　要：目的:综合评价贵州省50家首批县域医疗次中心医药服务能力,为下一步研究贵州省县域医疗次中心建设工作、提高乡镇卫生院(社区卫生服务中心)的医药服务能力提供依据和参考。方法:通过TOPSIS法、RSR法及二者模糊联合法对县域医疗次中心基层医疗机构医药服务能力进行评价。结果:50家首批县域医疗次中心中,医药服务能力排名前3家编号为G18、G6和G36,后3家编号为G27、G15和G22。结论:50家县域次中心之间的医药服务能力水平有明显差异。医疗服务能力高低具有地区差异。建议继续加大对次中心的支持力度,因地制宜、因时制宜制定相关政策,提升次中心的医药服务能力。Objective:To comprehensively evaluate the medical service capacity of 50 first batch county medical sub-centers in Guizhou Province,it provides the basis and references for further research on the construction of county medical sub-centers in Guizhou province and improvement of the medical service capacity of township health centers(community health service centers)in Guizhou Province.Methods:Through TOPSIS method,RSR method and the fuzzy combination method,the medical service capacity of the primary medical institutions in the county medical sub-center was evaluated.Results:Among the first batch of 50county-level secondary medical centers,the top three in terms of medical service capabilities were G18,G6,and G36,while the last three were G27,G15,and G22.Conclusion:There were significant differences in the medical and health service capacity among the 50 sub-centers.It is suggested to continue to increase the support for sub-centers,formulate relevant policies according to local conditions and time conditions,and improve the medical service capacity of sub-centers.

关 键 词：县域医疗卫生次中心 医药卫生服务能力 TOPSIS法 RSR法 

分 类 号：R1-9[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学] R197.62