明嘉靖朝孔庙祀典的厘正与朝鲜王朝的应对  

The Rectification of Confucian Temple Sacrificial Ceremony in the Ming Jiajing Dynasty and the Response of the Korean Dynasty

作　　者：刁书仁[1] Diao Shuren

机构地区：[1]东北师范大学历史文化学院,吉林长春130024

出　　处：《外国问题研究》2025年第1期58-73,159,共17页FOREIGN HISTORY STUDIES

摘　　要：朝鲜孔庙虽多遵中国之制,但始终彰显朝鲜孔庙特色。嘉靖九年,明世宗对孔庙祀典加以厘正,作为属国朝鲜的孔庙祀典是否“遵依天朝定式”加以厘正,成为嗣后百余年朝鲜反复讨论的话题,至肃宗八年朝鲜孔庙祀典才得以厘正。肃宗朝所厘正的孔庙祀典并非完全遵明嘉靖九年孔庙祀典,两者有很大不同。这种不同恰好揭示前近代中朝宗藩关系体制下,朝鲜虽对明事大,却不盲目遵从明“时王之制”,礼制文化上虽受中国影响,但有本土化特点,同时也反映出16世纪中叶至17世纪末中朝宗藩关系演进的内在纹理。Although most Confucian temples in Korea follow the Chinese system,they always demonstrate the characteristics of their own Confucian temples.In the ninth year of the Jiajing,Emperor Shizong of the Ming Dynasty revised the Confucian temple Sacrificial Ceremony,and whether the Confucian temple Sacrificial Ceremony,which belongs to Korea,should follow the rules of the Heavenly Dynasty,became a topic of repeated discussion in Korea for more than a hundred years.This topic lasted for 143 years,and it was not until the eighth year of Emperor Suzong that the Confucian Temple Sacrifice Ceremony in Korea was corrected.The Confucian temple Sacrificial Ceremony revised by the Suzong Dynasty did not completely follow the Confucian temple Sacrificial Ceremony of the ninth year of the Jiajing of the Ming Dynasty,and there were significant differences between the two.This difference precisely reveals that under the pre modern Sino Korean suzerain vassal relationship system,although Korea had great influence on the Ming Dynasty,it did not blindly follow the Ming system.Although the Li culture was influenced by China,it had localization characteristics,and also reflected the internal texture of the evolution of Sino Korean suzerain vassal relationship from the mid 16th century to the end of the 17th century.

关 键 词：孔庙祀典 厘正 朝鲜 应对 中朝关系 

分 类 号：K313.2[历史地理—历史学]