检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王英杰 Wang Yingjie
机构地区:[1]东北师范大学历史文化学院,吉林长春130024
出 处:《外国问题研究》2025年第1期74-83,159,共11页FOREIGN HISTORY STUDIES
摘 要:在1902年改订中日《通商行船条约》谈判内,日本一方面引入1898年清政府致驻华公使矢野文雄之灾年互赈照会,试图将国家道义条约化为公法依据;另一方面不断强调自由贸易和“门户开放”有助于缓解中国财政,以经济利害合理化启开米禁之诉求。嗣后又介入粤汉铁路赎回借款,利诱湖南铁路总公司同三井洋行签署购米合同。最终从1906年夏“赈恤米”违约转运着手,借1907年水患重申“矢野照会”与三井洋行合同,取得了六十万石大米赴日许可,打破了湖广米禁。这一系列运作,离不开日本对清末新政以来中国内外矛盾激化和东亚国际局势变迁的利用,实现了其对华中地区经济扩张与资源掠夺的殖民野心。Since the negotiation of the revision of the Sino Japanese Treaty of trade and shipping in 1902,Japan,on the one hand,introduced the disaster year mutual relief note sent by the Qing government to the minister in China,Yano Fumio,in 1898,trying to turn the national moral treaty into a public law basis;On the other hand,the continuous emphasis on free trade and“open door”will help ease China’s fiscal burden and rationalize the demand for rice ban with economic interests.Later,it intervened in the loan redemption of Yuehan railway,and Hunan Railway Corporation signed the rice purchase contract with Mitsui.Finally,starting from the default transfer of the“relief rice”in the summer of 1906,by virtue of the flood in 1907 to reiterate the“yanye note”and the contract with Mitsui,it obtained the permission of six hundred thousand stone rice to go to Japan,breaking the Huguang rice ban.This series of operations cannot be separated from Japan’s utilization of the intensification of internal and external contradictions in China and the changes in the international situation in East Asia since the new deal of the late Qing Dynasty,and finally practiced its colonial ambitions of economic expansion and resource plunder in Central China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171